ArticleJournal of experimental botany2019
Now for the hard ones: is there a limit on CRISPR genome editing in crops?
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sorghum as a monocot model for drought research.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- MADS-Box Subfamily GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- BabyBoom: 3-Dimensional Structure-Based Ligand and Protein Interaction Prediction by Molecular Docking.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Genome Editing in Crop Plant Research-Alignment of Expectations and Current Developments.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Knockout of Glycosyltransferases in Nicotiana benthamiana by Genome Editing to Improve Glycosylation of Plant-Produced Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Gene Editing Technologies for Sugarcane Improvement: Opportunities and Limitations.Sugar tech : an international journal of sugar crops & related industries · 2022Article
- Targeted plant improvement through genome editing: from laboratory to field.Plant cell reports · 2021Review
- Genome editing technologies: CRISPR, LEAPER, RESTORE, ARCUT, SATI, and RESCUE.EXCLI journal · 2021Review
- Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Responses and Regeneration between Diverse Bioenergy Sorghum Genotypes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Perspectives of CRISPR/Cas-mediatedHorticulture research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.