Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30721928›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular research2019

T cell checkpoint regulators in the heart.

Nir Grabie, Andrew H Lichtman, Robert Padera

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Caught in the crossfire: cardiac complications of cancer therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Deep insight into cytokine storm: from pathogenesis to treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nir GrabieDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, NRB Room 752N, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew H LichtmanDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, NRB Room 752N, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert PaderaDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, NRB Room 752N, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T lymphocyte-mediated immune responses in the heart are potentially dangerous because they can interfere with the electromechanical function. Furthermore, the myocardium has limited regenerative capacity to repair damage caused by effector T cells. Myocardial T cell responses are normally suppressed by multiple mechanisms of central and peripheral tolerance. T cell inhibitory molecules, so called immune checkpoints, limit the activation and effector function of heart antigen-reactive T cells that escape deletion during development in the thymus. Programmed cell protein death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) are checkpoint molecules homologous to the costimulatory receptor CD28, and they work to block activating signals from the T cell antigen receptor and CD28. Nonetheless, PD-1 and CTLA-4 function in different ways and at different steps in a T cell response to antigen. Studies in mice have established that genetic deficiencies of checkpoint molecules, including PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, and lymphocyte activation gene-3, result in enhanced risk of autoimmune T cell-mediated myocarditis and increased pathogenicity of heart antigen-specific effector T cells. The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway appears to be particularly important in cardiac protection from T cells. PD-L1 is markedly up-regulated on myocardial cells by interferon-gamma secreted by T cells and PD-1 or PD-L1 deficiency synergizes with other defects in immune regulation in promoting myocarditis. Consistent with these studies, myocarditis has emerged as a serious adverse reaction of cancer therapies that target checkpoint molecules to enhance anti-tumour T cell responses. Histopathology and immunohistochemical analyses of myocardial tissue from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-treated patients echoes findings in checkpoint-deficient mice. Many questions about myocarditis in the setting of cancer immunotherapy still need to be answered, including the nature of the target antigens, genetic risk factors, and variations in the disease with combined therapies. Addressing these questions will require further immunological analyses of blood and heart tissue from patients treated with ICB.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCardiotoxicityCTLA-4 AntigenHeartHeart DiseasesHumansLymphocyte ActivationMyocardiumNeoplasmsPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSignal TransductionAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorCheckpointImmunotherapyMyocarditisT lymphocyte

Identifiers

PMID30721928
PMCPMC6452292
OpenAlexW2913035631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.