Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30721886›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019

Fast shading correction for cone-beam CT via partitioned tissue classification.

Linxi Shi, Adam Wang, Jikun Wei, Lei Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adaptive proton therapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linxi ShiDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America.
Adam WangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America.
Jikun WeiLandauer Medical Physics, 2 Science Road, Glenwood, IL 60425, United States of America.
Lei ZhuSchool of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People's Republic of China.

Funding

STANFORD CANCER IMAGING TRAINING (SCIT) PROGRAMT32CA009695 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUCE L DANIEL, Jeremy Dahl · 1993 to 2026
$7.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantitative use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in radiation therapy is limited by severe shading artifacts, even with system embedded correction. We recently proposed effective shading correction methods, using planning CT (pCT) as prior information to estimate low-frequency errors in either the projection domain or image domain. In this work, we further improve the clinical practicality of our previous methods by removing the requirement of prior pCT images. Clinical CBCT images are typically composed of a limited number of tissues. By utilizing the low frequency characteristic of shading distribution, we first generate a 'shading-free' template image by enforcing uniformity on CBCT voxels of the same tissue type via a technique named partitioned tissue classification. Only a small subset of voxels in the template image are used in the correction process to generate sparse samples of shading artifacts. Local filtration, a Fourier transform based algorithm, is employed to efficiently process the sparse errors to compute a full-field distribution of shading artifacts for CBCT correction. We evaluate the method's performance using an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom and 6 pelvis patients. The proposed method improves the image quality of CBCT for both phantom and patients to a level matching that of pCT. On the pelvis phantom, the signal non-uniformity (SNU) is reduced from 12.11% to 3.11% and 8.40% to 2.21% on fat and muscle, respectively. The maximum CT number error is reduced from 70 to 10 HU and 73 to 11 HU on fat and muscle, respectively. On patients, the average SNU is reduced from 9.22% to 1.06% and 11.41% to 1.67% on fat and muscle, respectively. The maximum CT number error is reduced from 95 to 9 HU and 88 to 8 HU on fat and muscle, respectively. The typical processing time for one CBCT dataset is about 45 s on a standard PC.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPhantoms, ImagingCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMusclesPelvisProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30721886
PMCPMC6571138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.