Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30721544›Full record

Trial reportAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

Comparison of Subjective Responses to Oral and Intravenous Alcohol Administration Under Similar Systemic Exposures.

Martin Henry Plawecki, Adnan Mahmood Durrani, Julian Boes, Leah Wetherill, Ann Kosobud, Sean O'Connor, Vijay A Ramchandani

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Dopamine System in Mediating Alcohol Effects in Humans.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. To Infuse or Ingest in Human Laboratory Alcohol Research.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin Henry PlaweckiDepartment of Psychiatry , Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-0708-9514
Adnan Mahmood DurraniSection on Human Psychopharmacology , Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland.
Julian BoesDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics , Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Leah WetherillDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics , Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-2888-9051
Ann KosobudDepartment of Neurology , Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Sean O'ConnorDepartment of Psychiatry , Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-243X
Vijay A RamchandaniSection on Human Psychopharmacology , Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2474-2183

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DAVID A. KAREKEN · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
Alcohol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in HumansZIAAA000466 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI RAMCHANDANI, VIJAY ARJUN · 2009 to 2025
$31.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteTL1TR001107 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Alcohol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in HumansZ01AA000466 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI RAMCHANDANI, VIJAY ARJUN · 2006 to 2008
$762k
HUMAN ALCOHOL AND ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASESR37AA002342 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI LI, TING-KAI K · 1990 to 1999
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AA000466NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001107NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA02342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals perceive the effects of alcohol differently, and the variation is commonly used in research assessing the risk for developing an alcohol use disorder. Such research is supported by both oral and intravenous (IV) alcohol administration techniques, and any differences attributable to the route employed should be understood. Our objective was to test whether an individual's subjective responses to alcohol are similar when the breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) trajectory resulting from oral administration is matched by IV administration.

methodsWe conducted a 2-session, within-subject study in 44 young adult, healthy, nondependent drinkers (22 females and 22 males). In the first session, subjects ingested a dose of alcohol which was individually calculated, on the basis of total body water, to yield a peak BrAC near 80 mg/dl, and the resulting BrAC trajectory was recorded. A few days later, subjects received an IV alcohol infusion rate profile, precomputed to replicate each individual's oral alcohol BrAC trajectory. In both sessions, we assessed 4 subjective responses to alcohol: SEDATION, SIMULATION, INTOXICATION, and HIGH; at baseline and frequently for 4 hours. We compared the individuals' baseline-corrected responses at peak BrAC and at half-peak BrAC on both the ascending and descending limbs. We also computed and compared Pearson-product moment correlations of responses by route of administration, the Mellanby measure of acute adaptation to alcohol, and the area under the entire response curve for each subjective response.

resultsNo significant differences in any measure could be attributed to the route of alcohol administration. Eleven of 12 response comparisons were significantly correlated across the routes of alcohol administration, with 9 surviving correction for multiple measures, as did the Mellanby effect and area under the response curve correlations.

conclusionsThe route of alcohol administration has a minimal effect on subjective responses to alcohol when an individual's BrAC exposure profiles are similar.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdultAlcoholic IntoxicationBreath TestsCentral Nervous System StimulantsEthanolFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleProcedural SedationYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsEthanolMellanbyRoute of AdministrationSubjective ResponseTolerance

Identifiers

PMID30721544
PMCPMC6443482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.