Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30721365›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2019

A machine learning approach to predict perceptual decisions: an insight into face pareidolia.

Kasturi Barik, Syed Naser Daimi, Rhiannon Jones, Joydeep Bhattacharya, Goutam Saha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kasturi BarikDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India. kasturibarik@iitkgp.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-0899
Syed Naser DaimiDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India.
Rhiannon JonesDepartment of Psychology, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK.
Joydeep BhattacharyaDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths University of London, London, UK.
Goutam SahaDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India.

Funding

Ministry of Human Resource Development 4-23/2014-TS.I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of an external stimulus not only depends upon the characteristics of the stimulus but is also influenced by the ongoing brain activity prior to its presentation. In this work, we directly tested whether spontaneous electrical brain activities in prestimulus period could predict perceptual outcome in face pareidolia (visualizing face in noise images) on a trial-by-trial basis. Participants were presented with only noise images but with the prior information that some faces would be hidden in these images, while their electrical brain activities were recorded; participants reported their perceptual decision, face or no-face, on each trial. Using differential hemispheric asymmetry features based on large-scale neural oscillations in a machine learning classifier, we demonstrated that prestimulus brain activities could achieve a classification accuracy, discriminating face from no-face perception, of 75% across trials. The time-frequency features representing hemispheric asymmetry yielded the best classification performance, and prestimulus alpha oscillations were found to be mostly involved in predicting perceptual decision. These findings suggest a mechanism of how prior expectations in the prestimulus period may affect post-stimulus decision making.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkEEGFace pareidoliaPrior expectationSingle-trial classification

Identifiers

PMID30721365
PMCPMC6363645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.