Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30721327›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2019

[Surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures in high-risk geriatric patients under peripheral regional anesthesia : A clinical case series].

R Seidel, E Barbakow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R SeidelKlinik für Anästhesiologie, HELIOS-Kliniken Schwerin, Wismarsche Straße 393-7, 19049, Schwerin, Deutschland. ronald-seidel@t-online.de.
E BarbakowKlinik für Anästhesiologie, HELIOS-Kliniken Schwerin, Wismarsche Straße 393-7, 19049, Schwerin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors describe in a clinical case series (n = 7) of older (age 78-95 years) high-risk patients the successful surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures in a peripheral regional anesthesia technique. After positioning on the non-fractured side, a double injection technique (dual guidance concept: sonography plus nerve stimulation) was chosen. The injections were performed parasacrally (blockade of the sacral plexus under the piriformis muscle) and lumbar-paravertebrally (psoas compartment block and transmuscular quadratus lumborum block). Per block 15 ml ropivacaine 0.5% or 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% was administered. The total dose of 225 mg ropivacaine was never exceeded. In 5 out of 7 cases a supplemental medication with 2 times 5 μg sufentanil (n = 2) and/or 1-1.5 mg/kg body weight and h propofol (n = 4) was administered with spontaneous breathing. In addition to potential benefits, the authors also discuss limitations of the procedure, for example by the use of oral anticoagulants.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalFemaleFemoral FracturesHumansMaleNerve BlockRopivacaineAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineAnticoagulantsHip fracturesLumbosacral plexusNerve blockUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.