Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30721295›Full record

ArticleJAMA2019

Association of Type 1 Diabetes With Standardized Test Scores of Danish Schoolchildren.

Niels Skipper, Amanda Gaulke, Stine Møller Sildorf, Tine M Eriksen, Nick Fabrin Nielsen, Jannet Svensson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Care and Support of Children with Type 1 Diabetes at School: The Turkish ExperienceJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niels SkipperDepartment of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Amanda GaulkeDepartment of Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
Stine Møller SildorfCopenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tine M EriksenVIVE-The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nick Fabrin NielsenDepartment of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jannet SvenssonCopenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Type 1 diabetes has been associated with cardiovascular disease and late complications such as retinopathy and nephropathy. However, it is unclear whether there is an association between type 1 diabetes and school performance in children. Objective: To compare standardized reading and mathematics test scores of schoolchildren with type 1 diabetes vs those without diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015 (end date of follow-up), including Danish public schoolchildren attending grades 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8. Test scores were obtained in math (n = 524 764) and reading (n = 1 037 006). Linear regression models compared outcomes with and without adjustment for socioeconomic characteristics. Exposures: Type 1 diabetes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were pooled test scores in math and reading (range, 1-100). Results: Among 631 620 included public schoolchildren, the mean (SD) age was 10.31 (SD, 2.42) years, and 51% were male; 2031 had a confirmed diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Overall, the mean combined score in math and reading was 56.11 (SD, 24.93). There were no significant differences in test scores found between children with type 1 diabetes (mean, 56.56) and children without diabetes (mean, 56.11; difference, 0.45 [95% CI, -0.31 to 1.22]). The estimated difference in test scores between children with and without type 1 diabetes from a linear regression model with adjustment for grade, test topic, and year was 0.24 (95% CI, -0.90 to 1.39) and 0.45 (95% CI, -0.58 to 1.49) with additional adjustment for socioeconomic status. Conclusions and Relevance: Among Danish public schoolchildren, there was no significant difference in standardized reading and mathematics test scores of children with type 1 diabetes compared with test scores of children without diabetes.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementMathematicsReadingAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildDenmarkDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Educational StatusFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30721295
PMCPMC6439618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.