Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30720790›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Protocol for the Process Evaluation of a Complex, Statewide Intervention to Reduce Salt Intake in Victoria, Australia.

Kathy Trieu, Stephen Jan, Mark Woodward, Carley Grimes, Bruce Bolam, Caryl Nowson, Jenny Reimers, Chelsea Davidson, Jacqui Webster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathy TrieuThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia. ktrieu@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1848-2741
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia. sjan@georgeinstitute.org.
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia. markw@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Carley GrimesInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia. carley.grimes@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9123-1888
Bruce BolamDepartment of Health and Human Services, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. bruce.bolam@dhhs.vic.gov.au.
Caryl NowsonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia. caryl.nowson@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-7965
Jenny ReimersVictorian Health Promotion Foundation, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia. jreimers@vichealth.vic.gov.au.
Chelsea DavidsonNational Heart Foundation (Victorian Division), Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. chelsea.davidson@heartfoundation.org.au.
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia. jwebster@georgeinstitute.org.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1111457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic reviews of trials consistently demonstrate that reducing salt intake lowers blood pressure. However, there is limited evidence on how interventions function in the real world to achieve sustained population-wide salt reduction. Process evaluations are crucial for understanding how and why an intervention resulted in its observed effect in that setting, particularly for complex interventions. This project presents the detailed protocol for a process evaluation of a statewide strategy to lower salt intake in Victoria, Australia. We describe the pragmatic methods used to collect and analyse data on six process evaluation dimensions: reach, dose or adoption, fidelity, effectiveness, context and cost, informed by Linnan and Steckler's framework and RE-AIM. Data collection methods include routinely collected administrative data; surveys of processed foods, the population, food industry and organizations; targeted campaign evaluation and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data will be triangulated to provide validation or context for one another. This process evaluation will contribute new knowledge about what components of the intervention are important to salt reduction strategies and how the interventions cause reduced salt intake, to inform the transferability of the program to other Australian states and territories. This protocol can be adapted for other population-based, complex, disease prevention interventions.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyDiet, Sodium-RestrictedHealth PromotionHumansProcess Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignSodium Chloride, DietaryVictoriaSodium Chloride, Dietarydisease preventionhypertensionpopulation interventionsprocess evaluationpublic health nutritionsodium reduction

Identifiers

PMID30720790
PMCPMC6115992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.