Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30720619›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP

Public Health Informatics in Local and State Health Agencies: An Update From the Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey.

Timothy D McFarlane, Brian E Dixon, Shaun J Grannis, P Joseph Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhancing the nation's public health information infrastructure: a report from the ACMI symposium.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Delaware'sDelaware journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rising to Meet the Moment: What Does the Public Health Workforce Need to Modernize?Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy D McFarlaneDepartment of Epidemiology, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana (Mr McFarlane and Dr Dixon); Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana (Drs Dixon and Grannis); Center for Health Information and Communication, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Dixon); Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Grannis); and Department of Epidemiology, Marion County Public Health Department, Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Gibson).
Brian E Dixon
Shaun J Grannis
P Joseph Gibson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize public health informatics (PHI) specialists and identify the informatics needs of the public health workforce.

designCross-sectional study.

settingUS local and state health agencies.

participantsEmployees from state health agencies central office (SHA-COs) and local health departments (LHDs) participating in the 2017 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS). We characterized and compared the job roles for self-reported PHI, "information technology specialist or information system manager" (IT/IS), "public health science" (PHS), and "clinical and laboratory" workers.

main outcome measureDescriptive statistics for demographics, income, education, public health experience, program area, job satisfaction, and workplace environment, as well as data and informatics skills and needs.

resultsA total of 17 136 SHA-CO and 26 533 LHD employees participated in the survey. PHI specialist was self-reported as a job role among 1.1% and 0.3% of SHA-CO and LHD employees. The PHI segment most closely resembled PHS employees but had less public health experience and had lower salaries. Overall, fewer than one-third of PHI specialists reported working in an informatics program area, often supporting epidemiology and surveillance, vital records, and communicable disease. Compared with PH WINS 2014, current PHI respondents' satisfaction with their job and workplace environment moved toward more neutral and negative responses, while the IT/IS, PHS, and clinical and laboratory subgroups shifted toward more positive responses. The PHI specialists were less likely than those in IT/IS, PHS, or clinical and laboratory roles to report gaps in needed data and informatics skills.

conclusionsThe informatics specialists' role continues to be rare in public health agencies, and those filling that role tend to have less public health experience and be less well compensated than staff in other technically focused positions. Significant data and informatics skills gaps persist among the broader public health workforce.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth WorkforceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic HealthPublic Health InformaticsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30720619
PMCPMC6519871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.