ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs.
Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Professionalization of the public health workforce: scoping review and call to action.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- A qualitative analysis of public health officials' experience in California during COVID-19: priorities and recommendations.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- What Factors Influence the Interest in Working in the Public Health Service in Germany? Part I of the OeGD-Studisurvey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Training the MCH workforce: the Time for Change is now.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Article
- Workplace Perceptions and Experiences Related to COVID-19 Response Efforts Among Public Health Workers - Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey, United States, September 2021-January 2022.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2022Article
- Public Health Employees' Perceptions about the Impact of Emerging Public Health Trends on Their Day-to-Day Work: Effects of Organizational Climate and Culture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The State of the US Governmental Public Health Workforce, 2014-2017.American journal of public health · 2019Article
- Making a Living in Governmental Public Health: Variation in Earnings by Employee Characteristics and Work Setting.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Employee Perceptions About Public Health Agencies' Desired Involvement in Impacting Health Equity and Other Social Determinants of Health.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPObservational
- Unleashing the Creativity and Innovation of Our Greatest Resource-The Governmental Public Health Workforce.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Top Training Needs of the Governmental Public Health Workforce.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- The Financial and Business Analysis Capacities of the State and Local Public Health Workforce.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Regional Training Needs Assessment: A First Look at High-Priority Training Needs Across the United States by Region.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Factors of Success for Transitioning From a Scientific Role to a Supervisory Leadership Role in a Federal Public Health Agency, 2016.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
- Core Competency Gaps Among Governmental Public Health Employees With and Without a Formal Public Health Degree.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Master's-Level Education in the Governmental Public Health Workforce.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
- PH WINS 2021 Methodology Report.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Recovery and Resiliency in 29 Big Cities: Results From the 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Rising to Meet the Moment: What Does the Public Health Workforce Need to Modernize?Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- The Opportunity Cost of COVID for Public Health Practice: COVID-19 Pandemic Response Work and Lost Foundational Areas of Public Health Work.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) was first fielded in 2014 and is the largest public health workforce survey in the nation. This article elucidates the methods used for the 2017 PH WINS fielding. PROGRAM OR POLICY: PH WINS was fielded to a nationally representative sample of State Health Agency Central Office (SHA-CO) staff, as well as local health department (LHD) staff. The instrument largely mirrored 2014, though the training needs section was revised, and a validated item measuring burnout in staff was added. IMPLEMENTATION: Staff lists were collected directly from all participating state and local agencies. Forty-seven state health agencies (SHAs), 26 large LHDs, and 71 midsize LHDs participated. All SHAs were surveyed using a census approach. The nationally representative SHA-CO frame is representative of all central office staff members. The nationally representative local frame was a complex survey design, wherein staff from LHDs were randomly sampled across 20 strata, based on agency size and geographic region. Staff were also contributed with certainty from large LHDs in nondecentralized states. The frame is representative of staff at LHDs serving more than 25 000 people and with 25 or more staff members. Other LHDs are excluded, and so PH WINS is not representative of smaller LHDs. Balanced repeated replication weights were used to adjust variance estimates for the complex design. EVALUATION: Overall, 47 604 people responded to PH WINS in 2017 across all frames. PH WINS 2017 achieved a response rate of 48%. The design effect for the SHA-CO frame was 1.46 and was 16.42 for the local frame. DISCUSSION: PH WINS now offers a nationally representative sample of both SHA-CO and LHD staff across 4 major domains: workplace environment, training needs, emerging concepts in public health, and demographics. Both practice and academia can use PH WINS to better understand the perceptions and needs of staff, address training gaps, and work to recruit and retain quality staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.