SynthesisCritical care medicine2019
Impact of the Advanced Practice Provider in Adult Critical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discharge in the a.m.: A randomized controlled trial of physician rounding styles to improve hospital throughput and length of stay.Journal of hospital medicine · 2023Trial
- Teamwork Entrustable Professional Activities in Interprofessional Teams Involving Trainees and Advanced Practice Providers in the Intensive Care Unit.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Practice Areas, Skills, and Core Competencies of Advanced Practice Physiotherapists Working in Tertiary Care in Germany: Protocol for a 3-Round Delphi Study to Establish Expert Consensus.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Impact of surgical assistance by Japanese nurse practitioners in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- "I feel abandoned by nursing and not accepted by medicine": Factors undermining a healthy work environment for hospital-based nurse practitioners in the United States.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2026Article
- Sedation practices and associated clinical outcomes among adult ICU patients managed by advanced practice providers versus resident physicians.Journal of critical care · 2026Article
- Critical Care Advanced Practice Providers: Practice and Workforce.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- The intensive care unit balancing act: integrated staffing models for better patient ratios.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants: Building a Team and Optimizing Practice in the Medical ICU.Chest · 2025Review
- [Hemodynamic monitoring- (NOT) a nursing task?!]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024Article
- Fertility Preservation in Individuals with Cancer: A Joint Position Statement from APHON, CANO/ACIO, and ONS.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2024Article
- Advanced Practice Providers as Leaders of a Rapid Response Team: A Prospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pilot of rapid implementation of the advanced practice provider in the workflow of an existing tele-critical care program.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Advanced practice providers versus medical residents as leaders of rapid response teams: A 12-month retrospective analysis.PloS one · 2022Article
- The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- Advanced Practice Provider-inclusive Staffing Models and Patient Outcomes in Pediatric Critical Care.Medical care · 2021Article
- Satisfaction with Care and Satisfaction with Decision Making are Similar Regardless of Staffing Model in a Neurocritical Care Unit.Neurocritical care · 2021Article
- Procedures Performed by Advanced Practice Providers Compared With Medical Residents in the ICU: A Prospective Observational Study.Critical care explorations · 2020Article
- Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in Acute and Critical Care: A Concise Review of the Literature and Data 2008-2018.Critical care medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effects on quality and efficiency of implementation of the advanced practice provider in critical care. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were used to extract articles regarding advanced practice providers in critical care. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected when reporting a comparison between advanced practice providers and physician resident/fellows regarding the outcome measures of mortality, length of stay, or specific tasks. Descriptive studies without comparison were excluded. The methodological quality of the included studies was rated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The agreement between the reviewers was assessed with Cohen's kappa. A meta-analysis was constructed on mortality and length of stay. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One-hundred fifty-six studies were assessed by full text. Thirty comparative cohort studies were selected and analyzed. These compared advanced practice providers with physician resident/fellows. All studies comprised adult intensive care. Most of the included studies showed a moderate to good quality. Over time, the study designs advanced from retrospective designs to include prospective and comparative designs. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four random effects meta-analyses on length of stay and mortality were constructed from the available studies. These meta-analyses showed no significant difference between performance of advanced practice providers on the ICU and physician residents/fellows on the ICU, suggesting the quality of care of both groups was equal. Mean difference for length of stay on the ICU was 0.34 (95% CI, -0.31 to 1.00; I = 99%) and for in hospital length of stay 0.02 (95% CI, -0.85 to 0.89; I = 91%); whereas the odds ratio for ICU mortality was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.81-1.19; I = 37.3%) and for hospital mortality 0.92 (95% CI, 0.79-1.07; I = 28%).
conclusionsThis review and meta-analysis shows no differences between acute care given by advanced practice providers compared with physician resident/fellows measured as length of stay or mortality. However, advanced practice providers might add value to care in several other ways, but this needs further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.