Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30720260›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2019

An artificial neural network model for clinical score prediction in Alzheimer disease using structural neuroimaging measures

Nikhil Bhagwat, Jon Pipitone, Aristotle N. Voineskos, M. Mallar Chakravarty, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikhil BhagwatFrom the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Que. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Kimel Family Translational Imaging-Genetics Research Lab, Research Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Pipitone, Voineskos); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Voineskos); and the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Chakravarty), Canada.
Jon PipitoneFrom the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Que. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Kimel Family Translational Imaging-Genetics Research Lab, Research Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Pipitone, Voineskos); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Voineskos); and the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Chakravarty), Canada.
Aristotle N. VoineskosFrom the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Que. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Kimel Family Translational Imaging-Genetics Research Lab, Research Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Pipitone, Voineskos); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Voineskos); and the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Chakravarty), Canada.
M. Mallar ChakravartyFrom the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Que. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Kimel Family Translational Imaging-Genetics Research Lab, Research Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Pipitone, Voineskos); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Voineskos); and the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Chakravarty), Canada.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
1/3 - Social Processes Initiative in Neurobiology of the Schizophrenia(s)R01MH102324 · NIMH · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI VOINESKOS, ARISTOTLE NICHOLAS · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
Effects of Maintenance Treatment with Olanzapine vs. Placebo on Brain StructureR01MH099167 · NIMH · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI VOINESKOS, ARISTOTLE NICHOLAS · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
"MR Morphometrics and Cognitive Decline Rate in Large-Scale Aging Studies"K01AG030514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CARMICHAEL, OWEN T. · 2008 to 2012
$495k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG030514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099167NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The development of diagnostic and prognostic tools for Alzheimer disease is complicated by substantial clinical heterogeneity in prodromal stages. Many neuroimaging studies have focused on case–control classification and predicting conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease, but predicting scores from clinical assessments (such as the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale or the Mini Mental State Examination) using MRI data has received less attention. Predicting clinical scores can be crucial in providing a nuanced prognosis and inferring symptomatic severity. Methods: We predicted clinical scores at the individual level using a novel anatomically partitioned artificial neural network (APANN) model. The model combined input from 2 structural MRI measures relevant to the neurodegenerative patterns observed in Alzheimer disease: hippocampal segmentations and cortical thickness. We evaluated the performance of the APANN model with 10 rounds of 10-fold cross-validation in 3 experiments, using cohorts from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): ADNI1, ADNI2 and ADNI1 + 2. Results: Pearson correlation and root mean square error between the actual and predicted scores on the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADNI1: r = 0.60; ADNI2: r = 0.68; ADNI1 + 2: r = 0.63) and Mini Mental State Examination (ADNI1: r = 0.52; ADNI2: r = 0.55; ADNI1 + 2: r = 0.55) showed that APANN can accurately infer clinical severity from MRI data. Limitations: To rigorously validate the model, we focused primarily on large cross-sectional baseline data sets with only proof-of-concept longitudinal results. Conclusion: The APANN provides a highly robust and scalable framework for predicting clinical severity at the individual level using high-dimensional, multimodal neuroimaging data.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCerebral CortexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingProof of Concept StudyReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID30720260
PMCPMC6606432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.