Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30720206›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

Evaluation of principal component analysis image denoising on multi-exponential MRI relaxometry.

Mark D Does, Jonas Lynge Olesen, Kevin D Harkins, Teresa Serradas-Duarte, Daniel F Gochberg, Sune N Jespersen, Noam Shemesh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. High-resolution quantitative TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Improved myelin water imaging using BImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Locally low-rank denoising in transform domains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark D DoesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jonas Lynge OlesenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kevin D HarkinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Teresa Serradas-DuarteChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Daniel F GochbergInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sune N JespersenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Noam ShemeshChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Champalimaud Foundation · PTVanderbilt University Medical Center · USAarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKVanderbilt University · US

Funding

MRI Toolbox for Rodent Brain Microstructure ImagingR01EB019980 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DOES, MARK D · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
Upgrade of a 7T Small Animal MRI/MRS SystemS10OD019993 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2015 to 2015
$600k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019980NIH HHS S10 OD019993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMulti-exponential relaxometry is a powerful tool for characterizing tissue, but generally requires high image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This work evaluates the use of principal-component-analysis (PCA) denoising to mitigate these SNR demands and improve the precision of relaxometry measures.

methodsPCA denoising was evaluated using both simulated and experimental MRI data. Bi-exponential transverse relaxation signals were simulated for a wide range of acquisition and sample parameters, and experimental data were acquired from three excised and fixed mouse brains. In both cases, standard relaxometry analysis was performed on both original and denoised image data, and resulting estimated signal parameters were compared.

resultsDenoising reduced the root-mean-square-error of parameters estimated from multi-exponential relaxometry by factors of ≈3×, for typical acquisition and sample parameters. Denoised images and subsequent parameter maps showed little or no signs of spatial artifact or loss of resolution.

conclusionExperimental studies and simulations demonstrate that PCA denoising of MRI relaxometry data is an effective method of improving parameter precision without sacrificing image resolution. This simple yet important processing step thus paves the way for broader applicability of multi-exponential MRI relaxometry.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainComputer SimulationImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicePrincipal Component AnalysisdenoisingMRImulti-exponentialmyelinprincipal component analysisrelaxometry

Identifiers

PMID30720206
PMCPMC6955240
OpenAlexW2913334837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.