ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
Implantation of engineered conduction tissue in the rat heart.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Dexamethasone-Loaded Polymeric Electrospun Construct as a Tubular Cardiovascular Implant.Polymers · 2023Article
- Bioengineering the Cardiac Conduction System: Advances in Cellular, Gene, and Tissue Engineering for Heart Rhythm Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineered conduction tissues (ECTs) are cardiac conduction tissues fabricated in vitro to allow for more precisely targeted in vivo transplantation therapy. The transplantation of ECTs may be ideal for the treatment of atrioventricular conduction block and could have a significant impact on the future application of biological pacemakers. However, there is little published information regarding the conduction function of ECTs in vivo. In the present study, ECTs were constructed by seeding cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) into a collagen sponge and were then transplanted into animal hearts to determine whether they could act as an atrioventricular conduction pathway. The results demonstrated that the transplanted ECTs were adequately vascularized at the early stage of transplantation and could survive in the atrioventricular junction area of rats. A large number of myocardial tissue (≥29% of the new muscle fiber tissue formation area in the implanted ECTs) were observed by Masson's trichrome staining at 60 days post-transplantation. Positive staining for connexin-40, connexin-43, HCN2 and cTnT was exhibited during the period of 20 to 90 days post-transplantation. This result suggested that the transplanted ECTs formed gap junctions with the allogeneic myocardium and developed into cardiac conduction tissues with certain myocardial components. Electrocardiography (ECG) confirmed that there was a clear pre-excitation syndrome in the rats transplanted with ECTs during the period of 20 to 90 days post-transplantation. The recovery rate in the rats implanted with ECTs was 61.54% within 1 h following atrioventricular block, and the heart rhythm following recovery was close to normal. By contrast, the recovery rate was only 4.17% in the rats implanted with blank collagen sponges (BCSs), and none of the sham rats exhibited atrioventricular block recovery. In conclusion, ECTs can survive and mechanically integrate with the allogeneic myocardium following transplantation into rat hearts. An atrioventricular accessory pathway similar to Kent bundles could be established between the atria and ventricles of rats following implantation. It is suggested that ECTs may be a potential substitution therapy for atrioventricular conduction block.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.