Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719951›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2020

Comparison of the effects of buprenorphine and methadone in combination with medetomidine followed by intramuscular alfaxalone for anaesthesia of cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Alaleh Mahdmina, Abigail Evans, David Yates, Kate L White

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alaleh MahdminaRSPCA Greater Manchester Animal Hospital, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6233-2826
Abigail EvansRutland House Veterinary Hospital, St Helens, UK.
David YatesRSPCA Greater Manchester Animal Hospital, Salford, UK.
Kate L WhiteSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1439-0228
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · GBSt Helens Hospital · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the quality of anaesthesia and analgesia between methadone and buprenorphine in combination with medetomidine after induction with intramuscular (IM) alfaxalone in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

methodsFifty-one female cats (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-II), with a median age of 12 months (range 2-60 months), weighing a mean ± SD of 2.5 ± 0.5 kg, were recruited to the study. Cats were randomly allocated to receive medetomidine (600 µg/m

resultsForty-one cats completed the study. No significant differences were detected between groups before or during anaesthesia. No cats required rescue analgesia. DIVAS scores at 10 mins were significantly less in the MM group compared with the MB. No differences between groups at any other time points were detected using the four metrology instruments. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both protocols provided good anaesthesia conditions for ovariohysterectomy in the cat.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineCentral Nervous System DepressantsMedetomidineMethadonePregnanedionesAnimalsCatsFemaleHysterectomyInjections, IntramuscularOvariectomyPainalphaxaloneBuprenorphineCentral Nervous System DepressantsMedetomidineMethadonePregnanedionesAlfaxaloneanaesthesiabuprenorphinemethadoneovariohysterectomyspay

Identifiers

PMID30719951
PMCPMC10814567
OpenAlexW2912116955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.