Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719731›Full record

ArticlePlant, cell & environment2019

The role of plant species and soil condition in the structural development of the rhizosphere.

Jon R Helliwell, Craig J Sturrock, Anthony J Miller, W Richard Whalley, Sacha J Mooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Crops for Carbon Farming.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  13. Editorial: Rhizosphere Spatiotemporal Organisation.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jon R HelliwellDivision of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Gateway Building, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.
Craig J SturrockDivision of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Gateway Building, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5333-8502
Anthony J MillerMetabolic Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0572-7607
W Richard WhalleySustainable Soils and Grassland Systems Department, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0755-2943
Sacha J MooneyDivision of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Gateway Building, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9314-8113

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/JJ004553/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P016855/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00004967Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Designing Future Wheat
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Roots naturally exert axial and radial pressures during growth, which alter the structural arrangement of soil at the root-soil interface. However, empirical models suggest soil densification, which can have negative impacts on water and nutrient uptake, occurs at the immediate root surface with decreasing distance from the root. Here, we spatially map structural gradients in the soil surrounding roots using non-invasive imaging, to ascertain the role of root growth in early stage formation of soil structure. X-ray computed tomography provided a means not only to visualize a root system in situ and in 3-D but also to assess the precise root-induced alterations to soil structure close to, and at selected distances away from the root-soil interface. We spatially quantified the changes in soil structure generated by three common but contrasting plant species (pea, tomato, and wheat) under different soil texture and compaction treatments. Across the three plant types, significant increases in porosity at the immediate root surface were found in both clay loam and loamy sand soils and not soil densification, the currently assumed norm. Densification of the soil was recorded, at some distance away from the root, dependent on soil texture and plant type. There was a significant soil texture × bulk density × plant species interaction for the root convex hull, a measure of the extent to which root systems explore the soil, which suggested pea and wheat grew better in the clay soil when at a high bulk density, compared with tomato, which preferred lower bulk density soils. These results, only revealed by high resolution non-destructive imagery, show that although the root penetration mechanisms can lead to soil densification (which could have a negative impact on growth), the immediate root-soil interface is actually a zone of high porosity, which is very important for several key rhizosphere processes occurring at this scale including water and nutrient uptake and gaseous diffusion.

Indexed as

RhizosphereImaging, Three-DimensionalMechanical PhenomenaPisum sativumPlant RootsPorositySoilSolanum lycopersicumTomography, X-Ray ComputedTriticumWaterSoilWaterrhizosphereroot diametersoil structurestructural developmentX-ray computed tomography (CT)

Identifiers

PMID30719731
PMCPMC6563464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.