Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719634›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2019

Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Choice and Outcome of Two Different Treatment Options for Patients with Potentially Curable Esophageal Cancer.

Z Faiz, M van Putten, R H A Verhoeven, J W van Sandick, G A P Nieuwenhuijzen, M J C van der Sangen, V E P P Lemmens, B P L Wijnhoven, J T M Plukker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neoadjuvant versus definitive radiochemotherapy of locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer-who benefits?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Surveillance of Esophageal Cancer in the Republic of Uzbekistan from 2000 to 2018.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Z FaizDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M van PuttenDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R H A VerhoevenDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J W van SandickDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G A P NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M J C van der SangenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
V E P P LemmensDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J T M PlukkerDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.t.m.plukker@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was designed to assess the impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery.

methodsIn this population-based study, all patients with potentially curable EC (cT1N+/cT2-3, TX, any cN, cM0) diagnosed in the South East of the Netherlands between 2004 and 2014 were included. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS).

resultsA total of 702 patients was included. Age ≥ 75 years and multiple comorbidities were associated with a higher probability for dCRT (odds ratio [OR] 8.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.72-15.58; and OR 3.09; 95% CI 1.93-4.93). The strongest associations were found for the combination of hypertension plus diabetes (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.97-7.32) and the combination of cardiovascular with pulmonary comorbidity (OR 3.18; 95% CI 1.57-6.46). Patients with EC who underwent dCRT had a poorer prognosis than those who underwent nCRT plus surgery, irrespective of age, number, and type of comorbidities. In contrast, for patients with squamous cell carcinoma with ≥ 2 comorbidities or age ≥ 75 years, OS was comparable between both groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52; 95% CI 0.78-2.97; and HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.13-4.14).

conclusionsHistological tumor type should be acknowledged in treatment choices for patients with esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery should basically be advised as treatment of choice for operable esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with ≥ 2 comorbidities or age ≥ 75 years, dCRT may be the preferred strategy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAge FactorsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyComorbidityEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30719634
PMCPMC6399439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.