Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719610›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2019

Differences Over Time in the Prognostic Effect of Return to Work Self-Efficacy on a Sustained Return to Work.

Oliver Black, Malcolm R Sim, Alexander Collie, Peter Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of sustained return to work after sick leave due to mental disorders.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oliver BlackMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Monash University, Melbourne/Burwood, Australia. oliver.black@deakin.edu.au.
Malcolm R SimMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Monash University, Melbourne/Burwood, Australia.
Alexander CollieInsurance Work and Health Group, Monash University, Melbourne/Burwood, Australia.
Peter SmithMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Monash University, Melbourne/Burwood, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the association between return to work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) and sustained return to work (RTW) at two different time points, over a 12-month period. The primary objective of the study was to examine if the relationship between RTW-SE and a sustained RTW changed over the RTW timeline. Methods This study used survey responses from a longitudinal cohort of n = 410 workers' compensation claimants with either an upper-body musculoskeletal injury or a psychological injury. A path analysis tested the associations between RTW-SE and a sustained RTW at two time-points. A Wald χ

Indexed as

Self EfficacyEmploymentFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOccupational InjuriesPrognosisReturn to WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsWork Capacity EvaluationOccupational injuriesReturn to workSelf efficacyWorkers’ compensation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.