Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719586›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019

Computer-Assisted Nuclear Atypia Scoring of Breast Cancer: a Preliminary Study.

Ziba Gandomkar, Patrick C Brennan, Claudia Mello-Thoms

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziba GandomkarDiscipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Medical Image Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), The University of Sydney, 512/Block M, Cumberland Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia. ziba.gandomkar@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6480-3572
Patrick C BrennanDiscipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Medical Image Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), The University of Sydney, 512/Block M, Cumberland Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Claudia Mello-ThomsDiscipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Medical Image Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), The University of Sydney, 512/Block M, Cumberland Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inter-pathologist agreement for nuclear atypia scoring of breast cancer is poor. To address this problem, previous studies suggested some criteria for describing the variations appearance of tumor cells relative to normal cells. However, these criteria were still assessed subjectively by pathologists. Previous studies used quantitative computer-extracted features for scoring. However, application of these tools is limited as further improvement in their accuracy is required. This study proposes COMPASS (COMputer-assisted analysis combined with Pathologist's ASSessment) for reproducible nuclear atypia scoring. COMPASS relies on both cytological criteria assessed subjectively by pathologists as well as computer-extracted textural features. Using machine learning, COMPASS combines these two sets of features and output nuclear atypia score. COMPASS's performance was evaluated using 300 images for which expert-consensus derived reference nuclear pleomorphism scores were available, and they were scanned by two scanners from different vendors. A personalized model was built for three pathologists who gave scores to six atypia-related criteria for each image. Leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) was used. COMPASS was trained and tested for each pathologist separately. Percentage agreement between COMPASS and the reference nuclear scores was 93.8%, 92.9%, and 93.1% for three pathologists. COMPASS's performance in nuclear grading was almost identical for both scanners, with Cohen's kappa ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 for different pathologists and different scanners. Independently, the images were also assessed by two experienced senior pathologists. Cohen's kappa of COMPASS was comparable to the Cohen's kappa for two senior pathologists (0.79 and 0.68).

Indexed as

BiopsyBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingObserver VariationPathologistsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesBreastBreast cancerMicroscopyNuclear atypia gradingNuclear pleomorphism gradingPattern recognition

Identifiers

PMID30719586
PMCPMC6737167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.