Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719560›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

Spotting malignancies from gastric endoscopic images using deep learning.

Jang Hyung Lee, Young Jae Kim, Yoon Woo Kim, Sungjin Park, Youn-I Choi, Yoon Jae Kim, Dong Kyun Park, Kwang Gi Kim, Jun-Won Chung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: a systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Applications of artificial intelligence in gastroscopy: a narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jang Hyung LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Gachon University, 38 3-dockjeomro, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, South Korea.
Young Jae KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Gachon University, 38 3-dockjeomro, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, South Korea.
Yoon Woo KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Gachon University, 38 3-dockjeomro, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, South Korea.
Sungjin ParkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Gachon University, 38 3-dockjeomro, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, South Korea.
Youn-I ChoiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gachon-Gil Hospital, College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea.
Yoon Jae KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gachon-Gil Hospital, College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea.
Dong Kyun ParkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gachon-Gil Hospital, College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea.
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Gachon University, 38 3-dockjeomro, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, South Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-9714-6038
Jun-Won ChungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gachon-Gil Hospital, College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea. junwonchung@hanmail.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer is a common kind of malignancies, with yearly occurrences exceeding one million worldwide in 2017. Typically, ulcerous and cancerous tissues develop abnormal morphologies through courses of progression. Endoscopy is a routinely adopted means for examination of gastrointestinal tract for malignancy. Early and timely detection of malignancy closely correlate with good prognosis. Repeated presentation of similar frames from gastrointestinal tract endoscopy often weakens attention for practitioners to result in true patients missed out to incur higher medical cost and unnecessary morbidity. Highly needed is an automatic means for spotting visual abnormality and prompts for attention for medical staff for more thorough examination.

methodsWe conduct classification of benign ulcer and cancer for gastrointestinal endoscopic color images using deep neural network and transfer-learning approach. Using clinical data gathered from Gil Hospital, we built a dataset comprised of 200 normal, 367 cancer, and 220 ulcer cases, and applied the inception, ResNet, and VGGNet models pretrained on ImageNet. Three classes were defined-normal, benign ulcer, and cancer, and three separate binary classifiers were built-those for normal vs cancer, normal vs ulcer, and cancer vs ulcer for the corresponding classification tasks. For each task, considering inherent randomness entailed in the deep learning process, we performed data partitioning and model building experiments 100 times and averaged the performance values.

resultsAreas under curves of respective receiver operating characteristics were 0.95, 0.97, and 0.85 for the three classifiers. The ResNet showed the highest level of performance. The cases involving normal, i.e., normal vs ulcer and normal vs cancer resulted in accuracies above 90%. The case of ulcer vs cancer classification resulted in a lower accuracy of 77.1%, possibly due to smaller difference in appearance than those cases involving normal.

conclusionsThe overall level of performance of the proposed method was very promising to encourage applications in clinical environments. Automatic classification using deep learning technique as proposed can be used to complement manual inspection efforts for practitioners to minimize dangers of missed out positives resulting from repetitive sequence of endoscopic frames and weakening attentions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPeptic UlcerStomach NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCancerDeep learningEndoscopyGastrointestinal malignancyNeural networkResNetUlcer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.