Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719536›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

Radiomics-based machine learning methods for isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype prediction of diffuse gliomas.

Shuang Wu, Jin Meng, Qi Yu, Ping Li, Shen Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Artificial intelligence-based MRI radiomics and radiogenomics in glioma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuang WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jin MengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qi YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, 201321, China.
Shen FuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. shen_fu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9738-5899

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China No. 2017YFC0107600National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81773225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReliable and accurate predictive models are necessary to drive the success of radiomics. Our aim was to identify the optimal radiomics-based machine learning method for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genotype prediction in diffuse gliomas.

methodsEight classical machine learning methods were evaluated in terms of their stability and performance for pre-operative IDH genotype prediction. A total of 126 patients were enrolled for analysis. Overall, 704 radiomic features extracted from the pre-operative MRI images were analyzed. The patients were randomly assigned to either the training set or the validation set at a ratio of 2:1. Feature selection and classification model training were done using the training set, whereas the predictive performance and stability of the model were independently assessed using the validation set.

resultsRandom Forest (RF) showed high predictive performance (accuracy 0.885 ± 0.041, AUC 0.931 ± 0.036), whereas neural network (NN) (accuracy 0.829 ± 0.064, AUC 0.878 ± 0.052) and flexible discriminant analysis (FDA) (accuracy 0.851 ± 0.049, AUC 0.875 ± 0.057) displayed low predictive performance. With regard to stability, RF also showed high robustness against data perturbation (relative standard deviations, RSD 3.87%).

conclusionsRF is a promising machine learning method in predicting IDH genotype. Development of an accurate and reliable model can assist in the initial diagnostic evaluation and treatment planning for diffuse glioma patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGenotypeGliomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultIsocitrate DehydrogenaseDiffuse gliomaIsocitrate dehydrogenaseMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID30719536
PMCPMC6394679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.