Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719416›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology and pain medicine2018

Flow Cytometry of CD64, HLA-DR, CD25, and TLRs for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Review Article.

Ata Mahmoodpoor, Seyedpouya Paknezhad, Kamran Shadvar, Hadi Hamishehkar, Ali Akbar Movassaghpour, Sarvin Sanaie, Ali Akbar Ghamari, Hassan Soleimanpour

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Two New Neutrophil Subsets Define a Discriminating Sepsis Signature.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ata MahmoodpoorAnesthesiology Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Seyedpouya PaknezhadEmergency Medicine Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Kamran ShadvarAnesthesiology Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hadi HamishehkarDrug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali Akbar MovassaghpourHematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Sarvin SanaieAging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali Akbar GhamariAnesthesiology Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hassan SoleimanpourEmergency Medicine Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-4096
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is an important health problem with a high burden on health systems. Finding new aspects of immune system function in sepsis showed a new role for flow cytometry in the diagnosis of sepsis. We made a review on the role of CD64, HLA-DR, CD25, and TLRs as more useful flow cytometric tools in diagnosing sepsis, both in adults, and neonates. According to our results, we concluded that for diagnosis and treatment of the septic, flow cytometry can play an important role so that it can be used as a novel method in individualized treatment of septic patients based on their immune system situation.

Indexed as

CD 25CD 64Flow CytometryHLA-DRSepsisToll Like Receptor

Identifiers

PMID30719416
PMCPMC6347736
OpenAlexW2902279187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.