Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719413›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2018

Procedure-Specific Pain Intensity Four Days After Day Surgery and the Relationship with Preoperative Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Dirk Vrancken, Maurice Theunissen, Elbert A Joosten, Audrey A A Fiddelers, Daisy M N Hoofwijk, Wolfgang F F A Buhre, Hans-Fritz Gramke, Bj Ouml Rn Stessel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05834023 (Comparison Between Bupivacaine 0.5% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% Plus Lidocaine 1% in Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05834023 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Bupivacaine 0.5% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% Plus Lidocaine 1% in Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de San Carlos Dr. Benicio Arzola MedinaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsPain, Acute, Postoperative Pain, AnalgesiaArmsBupivacaine-Lidocaine, Bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dirk VranckenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Maurice TheunissenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Elbert A JoostenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Audrey A A FiddelersDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daisy M N HoofwijkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wolfgang F F A BuhreDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hans-Fritz GramkeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bj Ouml Rn StesselDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Maastricht University · NLJessa Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of painful procedures is essential for the development of procedure-specific pain-treatment schedules. The aim of this study was firstly, to analyze the prevalence of acute postsurgical pain (APSP) after various types of day surgery on the fourth postoperative day, and secondly, to assess the predictive value of preoperative pain for the development of APSP after different types of surgical procedures.

methodsFrom November 2008 to April 2010, patients scheduled for elective day surgery were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Data were collected one week preoperatively and four days postoperatively. The 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was used for pain measurement. Moderate pain was defined as an NRS 4 to 5, and severe pain as an NRS > 5. The predictive value of preoperative pain for development of APSP was analyzed using a univariate logistic regression, stratified for the surgical procedure.

resultsFrom a total of 1123 included patients, 182 patients experienced moderate pain (16.3%) and 136 patients experienced severe pain (12.1%) on the fourth postoperative day. A large procedure-specific variability in APSP was observed, with shoulder, anal and dental surgery associated with the highest pain levels. Overall, preoperative pain significantly predicted postoperative pain on the fourth day (OR 4.45). This predictive value showed a procedure-specific variation and was not noted after various well-defined procedures.

conclusionsThe prevalence of moderate to severe APSP was high four days after day surgery and showed a significant procedure-specific variation. Furthermore, there was a strong relationship between preoperative and postoperative pain, likewise characterized by a significant procedure-specific variation.

Indexed as

Acute Postsurgical PainDay SurgeryPreoperative PainPrevalenceProcedure-Specific

Identifiers

PMID30719413
PMCPMC6347732
OpenAlexW2901008447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.