Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719355›Full record

ArticleJournal of skin cancer2019

Basal Cell Carcinoma Pathology Requests and Reports Are Lacking Important Information.

Firas Al-Qarqaz, Khaldon Bodoor, Awad Al-Tarawneh, Haytham Eloqayli, Wisam Al Gargaz, Diala Alshiyab, Jihan Muhaidat, Mohammad Alqudah, Rowida Almomani, Maha Marji

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of skin cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Firas Al-QarqazDepartment of Dermatology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-4876-7406
Khaldon BodoorDepartment of Applied Biology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Awad Al-TarawnehDepartment of Internal Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Mu'tah, Jordan.
Haytham EloqayliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-0021-0887
Wisam Al GargazDepartment of Special Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Diala AlshiyabDepartment of Dermatology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, Jordan.
Jihan MuhaidatDepartment of Dermatology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, Jordan.
Mohammad AlqudahDepartment of Pathology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Rowida AlmomaniDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Maha MarjiDepartment of Dermatology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JOMutah University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBasal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer affecting humans. Luckily it has negligible risk for metastasis; however it can be locally destructive to surrounding tissue. The diagnosis of this tumor relies on clinical and dermoscopic features; however confirmation requires biopsy and histologic examination. Based on clinical and pathologic findings, BCC is classified as low or high risk subtype. The clinician requesting pathology examination for BCC should provide the pathologist with detailed information including patient details, relevant clinical and medical history, site and type of the biopsy, and whether this is a primary or recurrent lesion. The pathologist on the other hand should write an adequate report containing a minimum of core set of parameters including type of BCC, depth of invasion, presence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion, and the excision margins.

objectivesThe objective of this study is to evaluate whether requests by clinicians and pathology reports of BCC are adequate.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis done at the dermatology department, faculty of medicine at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. Reports for the period from January 2003 to December 2017 were retrieved and analyzed for data completeness.

resultsMost clinical request forms of BCC provided by clinicians are inadequate and lack important relevant information especially in regard to lesion history, patient medical history, and whether BCC is a primary or a recurrent one. Pathology reports for BCC cases also have significant deficiency especially in describing the histologic subtype, depth of invasion, and presence of lymphovascular and perineural invasion. However, the tumor excision margins are adequately described in almost all reports.

conclusionsThe study shows that clinicians do not provide adequate clinical information when submitting a request for histopathologic examination of BCC. Similarly, pathologists write incomplete reports that lack important pathologic features. Having pre-set forms (electronic proforma) can help overcome missing information.

Identifiers

PMID30719355
PMCPMC6335659
OpenAlexW2907285477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.