Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719326›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology2018

Comparison of PapilloCheck and Linear Array to Detect and Differentiate Human Papillomaviruses in Cervical and Tonsillar Smears from Females with Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions.

Donata Grimm, Linn Woelber, Katharina Prieske, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Sascha Kürti, Chia-Jung Busch, Ingo Teudt, Oliver Brummer, Volkmar Mueller, Thomas Meyer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of microbiology & immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Donata GrimmDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Linn WoelberDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Katharina PrieskeDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Sascha KürtiDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Chia-Jung BuschDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Ingo TeudtDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Hamburg Altona, Germany.
Oliver BrummerTagesklinikAltonaer Strasse, Private Praxis of Gynaecology, Hamburg, Germany.
Volkmar MuellerDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Thomas MeyerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEAsklepios Klinik Altona · DEFrauenklinik an der Elbe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A subgroup of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) are causally linked to infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPVs). To evaluate the prevalence of simultaneous oral HPV infection in females with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), tonsillar- and cervical smears were collected simultaneously from 73 patients and analyzed for HPV using two commercial assays, PapilloCheck (Greiner-Bio-One) and Linear Array (Roche). Only 3/73 (4.1%) tonsillar smears were HPV positive (HPV+), with HPV types 16, 35, and 45, respectively, detected by both assays (100% agreement). Concordant results were also found in 60/66 (91%) evaluable cervical smears. Of specimens, positive by both assays, typing results completely coincide in 71% (all types are identical) and partially coincide in 27% (at least one type is identical). Taken together, results of HPV detection and typing by PapilloCheck and Linear Array are highly congruent and confirm the low prevalence of HR-HPV in tonsillar smears of patients with HSIL of the uterine cervix. Our data indicate low prevalence of oropharyngeal HPV infection in patients with high-grade cervical dysplasia. The low detection rate was confirmed by using two different commercial assays with largely consistent results of HPV detection and typing, but with some variation for particular HPV types. Comparative testing of larger numbers is required to identify the HPV types prone to escape detection with particular assays.

Indexed as

cervical cancer (CC)CINHSILhuman papillomavirus (HPV)oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)sexual transmitted disease

Identifiers

PMID30719326
PMCPMC6348707
OpenAlexW2905442331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.