Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30719269›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2018

More evidence is needed. Iron, incident cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review.

Diane E Hosking, Scott Ayton, Nigel Beckett, Andrew Booth, Ruth Peters

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Diane E HoskingCentre for Research into Ageing Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Scott AytonThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Nigel BeckettCare of the Elderly, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andrew BoothSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ruth PetersLifecourse Ageing Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-3617
Australian National University · AUImperial College London · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Sheffield · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur aim was to systematically review the relationship between iron and incident cognitive decline or dementia from midlife onwards.

methodsSystematic review of eligible studies using Medline, Embase and PsycINFO

resultsA total of 1185 relevant records were identified with 12 full-text articles eligible for review. Six studies were excluded, leaving six texts to be included. Sample size ranged from 90 to 7173, with an average follow up of approximately 11.5 years. Baseline iron measures included brain iron (

conclusionsDiversity across the small number of identified studies precludes conclusions regarding the role of iron in cognitive decline or dementia. Our review highlights substantial gaps in the evidence base and the need for more comprehensive, higher quality studies in this area.

Indexed as

cognitive ageingdementiaincidenceironreview

Identifiers

PMID30719269
PMCPMC6348531
OpenAlexW2884217622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.