ArticleShoulder & elbow2019
Arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for non-engaging Hill-Sachs lesion in professional collision athletes.
Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- High Rates of Return to Sport After Surgical Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Coracoid bone-block versus soft-tissue stabilization for anterior shoulder instability in professional athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of return to play and recurrence rates.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Glenoid version and recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: a case-control study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Remplissage with Bankart repair in "on track" lesions are safe, re-assuring, and without major complications - a comparative analysis among 80 patients.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Article
- Bankart repair and remplissage for surgical treatment of first episode of acute anterior shoulder dislocation: long-term results.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- An Evidence-Based Approach to Indication for Remplissage.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Return to Competitive Sport After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Scoping Review of Current Outcomes and Clearance Decision-Making Criteria.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025Article
- Management of anterior shoulder instability in the contact athlete: a narrative review.Annals of joint · 2025Review
- Comparison between arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Bankart/SLAP lesion repair in limited-contact athletes with type V SLAP lesion. A prospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Understanding the Remplissage: History, Biomechanics, Outcomes, and Current Indications.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024Review
- Rehabilitation Protocol Variability Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Remplissage for Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- AJournal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Why do patients with anterior shoulder instability not return to sport after surgery? A systematic review of 63 studies comprising 3545 patients.JSES international · 2023Review
- Recurrent Shoulder Instability after Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in an Elite Baseball Pitcher-A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Effect of Playing Position on Return to Sport, Functional Outcomes, and Recurrence After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Soccer Players.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Consideration May Be Given to Lowering the Threshold for the Addition of Remplissage in Patients With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Arthroscopic Bankart and Remplissage for Anteroinferior Instability With Subcritical Bone Loss Has a Low Recurrence Rate.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Outcomes of the arthroscopic Bankart procedure in Irish collision sport athletes.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Is Revision Bankart Repair with Remplissage a Viable Option for Failed Bankart Repair in Non-contact Sports Person Aiming to Return to Sports?Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Arthroscopic reduction and subscapularis remplissage (ARR) of chronic posterior locked shoulder dislocation leads to optimized outcomes and low rate of complications.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study aimed to determine whether arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair is an effective treatment for improving outcomes for collision athletes with Bankart and non-engaging Hill-Sachs lesions.
methodsTwenty collision athletes underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with posterior capsulotenodesis (B&R group) and were evaluated retrospectively, using pre- and postoperative WOSI (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability), EQ-5D (EuroQOL five dimensions), EQ-VAS (EuroQol-visual analogue scale) scores and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). The recurrence and re-operation rates were compared to a matched group with isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair (B group).
resultsThe mean age was 25 years with an mean follow-up of 26 months. All mean scores improved with SSV of 90%. There was a mean deficit in external rotation at the side of 10°. One patient was treated with hydrodilatation for frozen shoulder. One patient had residual posterior discomfort but no apprehension in the B&R group compared to 5% persistent apprehension in the B group. In comparison, the recurrence and re-operation rates were 5% and 30% (
conclusionsThis combined technique demonstrated good outcomes, with lower recurrence rates in high-risk collision athletes. The slight restriction in external rotation does not significantly affect any clinical outcomes and return to play.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.