Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30718868›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2019

1,520 reference genomes from cultivated human gut bacteria enable functional microbiome analyses.

Yuanqiang Zou, Wenbin Xue, Guangwen Luo, Ziqing Deng, Panpan Qin, Ruijin Guo, Haipeng Sun, Yan Xia, Suisha Liang, Ying Dai and 21 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 316 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
316citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
36.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

316 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 593 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

256 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuanqiang ZouBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2380-264X
Wenbin XueBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Guangwen LuoBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Ziqing DengBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8726-0160
Panpan QinBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-8736
Ruijin GuoBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Haipeng SunBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Yan XiaBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Suisha LiangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Ying DaiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Daiwei WanBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Rongrong JiangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Lili SuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Qiang FengBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Zhuye JieBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Tongkun GuoBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Zhongkui XiaBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Chuan LiuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jinghong YuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Yuxiang LinBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Shanmei TangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Guicheng HuoKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, College of Food Sciences, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xun XuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Yong HouBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0420-0726
Xin LiuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3256-2940
Jian WangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Huanming YangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Karsten KristiansenBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6024-0917
Junhua LiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. lijunhua@genomics.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6784-1873
Huijue JiaBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. jiahuijue@genomics.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3592-126X
Liang XiaoBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. xiaoliang@genomics.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-4397
BGI Group (China) · CNNortheast Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference genomes are essential for metagenomic analyses and functional characterization of the human gut microbiota. We present the Culturable Genome Reference (CGR), a collection of 1,520 nonredundant, high-quality draft genomes generated from >6,000 bacteria cultivated from fecal samples of healthy humans. Of the 1,520 genomes, which were chosen to cover all major bacterial phyla and genera in the human gut, 264 are not represented in existing reference genome catalogs. We show that this increase in the number of reference bacterial genomes improves the rate of mapping metagenomic sequencing reads from 50% to >70%, enabling higher-resolution descriptions of the human gut microbiome. We use the CGR genomes to annotate functions of 338 bacterial species, showing the utility of this resource for functional studies. We also carry out a pan-genome analysis of 38 important human gut species, which reveals the diversity and specificity of functional enrichment between their core and dispensable genomes.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomeBacteriaCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyConserved SequenceFecesGenome, BacterialGenomicsHumansMetagenomicsPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30718868
PMCPMC6784896
OpenAlexW2912990896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.