Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30718842›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Deactivation of default mode network during touch.

Timmy Strauss, Robin Kämpe, J Paul Hamilton, Hakan Olausson, Fabian Rottstädt, Claudia Raue, Ilona Croy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Timmy StraussDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany. timmy.strauss@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Robin KämpeCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
J Paul HamiltonCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Hakan OlaussonCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Fabian RottstädtDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Claudia RaueDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische, Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Ilona CroyDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DELinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpersonal touch possesses a strong affective component, which immediately evokes attention. The neural processing of such touch is moderated by specialized C-tactile nerve fibers in the periphery and results in central activation of somatosensory areas as well as regions involved in social processing, such as the superior temporal gyrus (STG). In the present functional neuroimaging investigation, we tested the hypothesis that the attention grasping effect of interpersonal touch as compared to impersonal touch is reflected in a more-pronounced deactivation of the default mode network (DMN). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the neural processing of interpersonal relative to impersonal touch conditions that were furthermore modulated by stroking velocity in order to target c-tactile nerve fibers to a different extent. A sample of 30 healthy participants (19 women, mean age 40.5 years) was investigated. In the impersonal touch, participants were stroked with a brush on the forearm. In the interpersonal touch condition, the experimenter performed the stroking with the palm of his hand. Interpersonal touch was rated as more pleasant and intense than impersonal touch and led to a stronger blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal increase in the somatosensory cortex SII extending to the superior temporal cortex. Over all touch conditions, this activation was coupled in time to the deactivation of prominent nodes of the DMN. Although deactivation of the DMN was most pronounced for interpersonal touch conditions, the direct comparison did not show significant differences in DMN deactivation between interpersonal and impersonal touch or between different stroking velocities. We therefore conclude that all applied touch conditions deactivate the DMN and the strong connection to areas which code the contextual and social characteristics of affective touch may explain the attention grasping effect of touch.

Identifiers

PMID30718842
PMCPMC6361921
OpenAlexW2936212779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.