Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30718832›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2019

Molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer.

Eric A Collisson, Peter Bailey, David K Chang, Andrew V Biankin

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 563 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
563citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04787991 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Open-label, ExploRatory Platform Trial to EValuate ImmunOtherapy Combinations With Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With PreviousLy UnTreated MetastatIc Pancreatic AdenOcarciNoma (REVOLUTION)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCancer Insight, LLCRan2021 to 2025Enrolled45ConditionsMetastatic Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaArmsNivolumab (Cohort A), Ipilimumab (Cohort A, B and C), Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (Cohort B), Nab-paclitaxel (nP) (Cohort A, B and C), Gemcitabine (gem) (Cohort A, B and C)
NCT06574620 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Accelerating the Actionability of Treatment in Resected and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorBritish Columbia Cancer AgencyRan2025 to 2031Enrolled200ConditionsPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaArmsGenetic testing, Optional biopsy, Tissue collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

563 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Interleukin-1α (IL-1α) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: implications for immunotherapy and molecular biomarkers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeting ferroptosis to overcome drug resistance in gastrointestinal cancers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

503 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric A CollissonUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Peter BaileyWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
David K ChangWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Andrew V BiankinWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. andrew.biankin@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0362-5597

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17263Medical Research Council MR/N005813/1Pancreatic Cancer UK FLF2015_04_GLASGOW
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancers that appear morphologically similar often have dramatically different clinical features, respond variably to therapy and have a range of outcomes. Compelling evidence now demonstrates that differences in the molecular pathology of otherwise indistinguishable cancers substantially impact the clinical characteristics of the disease. Molecular subtypes now guide preclinical and clinical therapeutic development and treatment in many cancer types. The ability to predict optimal therapeutic strategies ahead of treatment improves overall patient outcomes, minimizing treatment-related morbidity and cost. Although clinical decision making based on histopathological criteria underpinned by robust data is well established in many cancer types, subtypes of pancreatic cancer do not currently inform treatment decisions. However, accumulating molecular data are defining subgroups in pancreatic cancer with distinct biology and potential subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities, providing the opportunity to define a de novo clinically applicable molecular taxonomy. This Review summarizes current knowledge concerning the molecular subtyping of pancreatic cancer and explores future strategies for using a molecular taxonomy to guide therapeutic development and ultimately routine therapy with the overall goal of improving outcomes for this disease.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalClinical Decision-MakingGenetic MarkersHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.