Fast X-ray Differential Phase Contrast Imaging with One Exposure and without Movements.

Jian Fu, Xianhong Shi, Wei Guo, Peng Peng

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian FuResearch Center of Digital Radiation Imaging and Biomedical Imaging, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China. fujian706@buaa.edu.cn.

Xianhong ShiSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.

Wei GuoSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.

Peng PengSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-1421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grating interferometry X-ray differential phase contrast imaging (GI-XDPCI) has provided enhanced imaging contrast and attracted more and more interests. Currently the low imaging efficiency and increased dose remain to be the bottlenecks in the engineering applications of GI-XDPCI. Different from the widely-used X-ray absorption contrast imaging (XACI) found in hospitals and factories, GI-XDPCI involves a grating stepping procedure that is time-consuming and leads to a significantly increased X-ray exposure time. In this paper, we report a fast GI-XDPCI method without movements by designing a new absorption grating. There is no grating stepping in this approach, and all components remain stationary during the imaging. Three kinds of imaging contrasts are provided with greatly reduced time. This work is comprised of a numerical study of the method and its verification using a sub-set of the dataset measured with a standard GI-XDPCI system at the beam line BL13W1 of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). These results have validated the presented method.

Identifiers

PMID30718674

DOI10.1038/s41598-018-37687-0

PMCPMC6361880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.