Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30718668›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Using all-sky differential photometry to investigate how nocturnal clouds darken the night sky in rural areas.

Andreas Jechow, Franz Hölker, Christopher C M Kyba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An all-sky light pollution model for global-scale applications that embraces a full range of cloud distributions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Colour of the Night Sky.Journal of imaging · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas JechowLeibniz Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Ecohydrology, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany. andreas.jechow@gmx.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7596-6366
Franz HölkerLeibniz Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Ecohydrology, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany.
Christopher C M KybaLeibniz Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Ecohydrology, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7014-1843
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial light at night has affected most of the natural nocturnal landscapes worldwide and the subsequent light pollution has diverse effects on flora, fauna and human well-being. To evaluate the environmental impacts of light pollution, it is crucial to understand both the natural and artificial components of light at night under all weather conditions. The night sky brightness for clear skies is relatively well understood and a reference point for a lower limit is defined. However, no such reference point exists for cloudy skies. While some studies have examined the brightening of the night sky by clouds in urban areas, the published data on the (natural) darkening by clouds is very sparse. Knowledge of reference points for the illumination of natural nocturnal environments however, is essential for experimental design and ecological modeling to assess the impacts of light pollution. Here we use differential all-sky photometry with a commercial digital camera to investigate how clouds darken sky brightness at two rural sites. The spatially resolved data enables us to identify and study the nearly unpolluted parts of the sky and to set an upper limit on ground illumination for overcast nights at sites without light pollution.

Identifiers

PMID30718668
PMCPMC6361923
OpenAlexW2911771035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.