Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30718570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Selection for background matching drives sympatric speciation in Wall Gecko.

Domenico Fulgione, Maria Buglione, Daniela Rippa, Martina Trapanese, Simona Petrelli, Daria Maria Monti, Massimo Aria, Rita Del Giudice, Valeria Maselli

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Domenico FulgioneDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy. fulgione@unina.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5121-3298
Maria BuglioneDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Daniela RippaDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Martina TrapaneseDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Simona PetrelliDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Daria Maria MontiDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Massimo AriaDepartment of Economics and Statistics, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Rita Del GiudiceDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Valeria MaselliDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cupa Nuova Cinthia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-8063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wall Gecko shows heterogeneous colour pattern, which may vary among individuals, depending on the time of day and on the habitat segregation. Nocturnal pale geckos live exclusively on walls. Diurnal dark geckos preferentially live on olive tree trunks, demonstrating an ability to change skin colour that is superior to that of the pale gecko and allows diurnal geckos becoming camouflaged on the diverse substrates occupied during the day. In our study, the nocturnal/pale/wall and diurnal/dark/trunk geckos could be considered the extremes of an ecological cline of morphological variation on which divergent selection may be acting. Combining the effect of balancing selection on nocturnal geckos and disruptive selection between two sympatric populations could lead to speciation. All geckos analysed here belong to the same species, as confirmed by genetic characterization, however diurnal and nocturnal gecko populations seem to be in an early stage of incipient speciation. These two different morphs still combine genes, as revealed by neutral genetic markers, yet they show complete separation according to the analyses of mtDNA coding genes. Experimental results show that diurnal and nocturnal geckos do not swap their niches, likely because the predation pressure causes severe selection for background matching. Genomic analysis of complete mtDNA suggests that nocturnal geckos seem to be under balancing selection perhaps due to the narrow niche in which they live, whereas the daytime population has more opportunity in fitting into the multiple available niches, and they experience positive selection. Here we hypothesize that the ecological segregation that we are witnessing between the nocturnal and diurnal geckos, can lead to a ecological speciation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGenetic SpeciationAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialLizardsDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID30718570
PMCPMC6361904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.