ArticleScientific reports2019
Diagnostic Value of Circulating microRNAs for In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusive Disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNAs in type 2 diabetes mellitus and its cardiovascular complications: mechanistic insights and translational potential.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Predictive value of miR-193a-5p combined with VEGFB in the diagnosis and prognosis of CHD.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Inflammatory and Prothrombotic Biomarkers, DNA Polymorphisms, MicroRNAs and Personalized Medicine for Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The Diagnostic Value of Circulating Biomarkers and Role of Drug-Coated Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Role of Circulating Biomarkers in Peripheral Arterial Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Roles of MicroRNAs in Peripheral Artery In-Stent Restenosis after Endovascular Treatment.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- Article
- The Current State of MicroRNAs as Restenosis Biomarkers.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Association between MicroRNA-4669 Polymorphism and Ischemic Stroke in a Korean Population.Disease markers · 2019Article
- MicroRNAs in peripheral artery disease: potential biomarkers and pathophysiological mechanisms.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-stent restenosis (ISR) is still a major cause of failure of endovascular stenting treatment in patients with lower extremity arterial occlusive disease (LEAOD). Sensitive and reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis to predict ISR should be considered. This study was conducted to explore the diagnostic value of microRNA in predicting ISR in patients with LEAOD after endovascular stenting treatment. From March 2014 to July 2016, 208 patients (170 males and 38 females) with LEAOD undergoing interventional treatment were enrolled in this research. Patients were divided into the restenosis and non-restenosis groups according to routine postoperative angiography. Circulating microRNAs expression were detected in 208 participants, including 78 ISR patients, 68 non-ISR patients and 62 healthy volunteers. We selected 6 microRNAs from microarray screening as candidates for further testing via qRT-PCR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to assess the diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs in predicting ISR for LEAOD patients. The results showed that circulating microRNA-320a and microRNA-572 in patients with ISR (n = 78) had significantly higher expression levels than it from non-ISR and healthy volunteers. By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the sensitivity was 82.1% and the specificity was 63.8% for microRNA-320a; the sensitivity was 69.2% and the specificity was 68.9% for microRNA-572, and the AUC was 0.766 and 0.690 for detection of ISR, respectively. Furthermore, 78 patients with ISR had significantly higher circulating expression levels of microRNA-3937 and microRNA-642a-3p and lower circulating expression levels of microRNA-4669 and microRNA-3138 compared with 68 non-ISR patients and 62 healthy volunteers, but they have no significant difference. We found that differential circulating microRNA expression in patients after stenting with ISR, and the data indicate that circulating microRNA-320a and microRNA-572 have promising value in diagnosing ISR in patients with LEAOD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.