ArticleScientific reports2019
Clinical outcomes and causes of arthroscopic hip revision surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Favorable subjective clinical outcomes after revision hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome despite a high rate of capsular defects and increased capsular thickness.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026Article
- Femoral head infarction: a case-control study of a rare complication.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes of the Arthroscopic Capsular Suture-Lifting Technique in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Effect of Changes in Iliocapsularis Cross-sectional Area on Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- The narrow subspine space and relatively large labrum are radiographic features of subspine impingement: a case-control study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Variations in postoperative electrolyte concentrations and influential factors in hip arthroscopy.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- High prevalence of acetabular rim osteophytes after hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Total hip arthroplasty revision etiologies: a cross-sectional study in Isfahan, Iran.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022Article
- The Application of Arthroscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hip-Related Conditions in China.Orthopaedic surgery · 2021Review
- Hip arthroscopy has good clinical outcomes in the treatment of osteoid osteoma of the acetabulum.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Approach to Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Tips and Tricks.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip arthroscopic surgery has become a common technique during the past decade, leading to an increased number of arthroscopic hip revision surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in a series of revision hip arthroscopies to analyse the causes of reoperation in the short to medium-term follow-up. We retrospectively analysed 22 patients who underwent arthroscopic hip revision surgery in our institute. All patients accepted a detailed physical examination and obtained radiographs to measure the centre edge angle, the alpha angle and the offset. Three-dimensional computed tomography was used to evaluate the deformities. The modified Harris Hip Score, visual analogue scale and patient self-reported satisfaction were collected and analysed preoperatively and postoperatively. Our results demonstrated that the modified Harris Hip Score improved from 52.8 to 81.6, and the visual analogue scale decreased from 5.0 to 1.1. Patient self-reported satisfaction was 8.5. In conclusion, patients who underwent arthroscopic hip revision surgery exhibited significant improvement in patient-centred outcomes in the short- to medium-term follow-up, and the outcomes indicated the effectiveness of revision surgery. Residual femoroacetabular impingement and extra-articular impingement are common reasons for arthroscopic hip revision surgery. Misdiagnosis of osteoid osteoma and relapse of synovial chondromatosis are also important reasons for revision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.