ArticleScientific reports2019
Influences of scan-position on clinical ultra-high-resolution CT scanning: a preliminary study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of risk factors for postoperative recurrence of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Predicting the histological invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma manifesting as persistent pure ground-glass nodules by ultra-high-resolution CT target scanning in the lateral or oblique body position.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to access influences of scan-position on clinical ultra-high-resolution CT scanning. We proposed a breath-hold assisted ultra-high-resolution scanning technology (scan scheme G) and compared with scan scheme A (regular CT plain scan) and scheme B (1024 ultra-high-resolution scan with patients stay in supine position). A total of 30 patients with fGGO were included in this study. Three highly experienced chest imaging doctors were employed to score the image and to select regions of interest (ROIs) for CT value and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) calculation. In comparison with scan A and B, this new scan scheme G shows more clear CT images and higher SNRs at overall lung field (the p-values of A versus G and B versus G are 0.041 and 0.065, respectively). These findings suggest that scan-G provides a better image quality and contributes significantly to clinical detection accuracy of fGGO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.