Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30718492›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2019

Effects of familial risk and stimulant drug use on the anticipation of monetary reward: an fMRI study.

Alanna L Just, Chun Meng, Dana G Smith, Edward T Bullmore, Trevor W Robbins, Karen D Ersche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Brain networks underlying vulnerability and resilience to drug addiction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alanna L JustDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Chun MengDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-6627
Dana G SmithDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Edward T BullmoreDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-8283
Trevor W RobbinsDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Karen D ErscheDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ke220@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-1878
University of Cambridge · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0701497Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council MR/J012084/1Wellcome Trust 105602/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between stimulant drug use and aberrant reward processing is well-documented in the literature, but the nature of these abnormalities remains elusive. The present study aims to disentangle the separate and interacting effects of stimulant drug use and pre-existing familial risk on abnormal reward processing associated with stimulant drug addiction. We used the Monetary Incentive Delay task, a well-validated measure of reward processing, during fMRI scanning in four distinct groups: individuals with familial risk who were either stimulant drug-dependent (N = 41) or had never used stimulant drugs (N = 46); and individuals without familial risk who were either using stimulant drugs (N = 25) or not (N = 48). We first examined task-related whole-brain activation followed by a psychophysiological interaction analysis to further explore brain functional connectivity. For analyses, we used a univariate model with two fixed factors (familial risk and stimulant drug use). Our results showed increased task-related activation in the putamen and motor cortex of stimulant-using participants. We also found altered task-related functional connectivity between the putamen and frontal regions in participants with a familial risk (irrespective of whether they were using stimulant drugs or not). Additionally, we identified an interaction between stimulant drug use and familial risk in task-related functional connectivity between the putamen and motor-related cortical regions in potentially at-risk individuals. Our findings suggest that abnormal task-related activation in motor brain systems is associated with regular stimulant drug use, whereas abnormal task-related functional connectivity in frontostriatal brain systems, in individuals with familial risk, may indicate pre-existing neural vulnerability for developing addiction.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseRewardAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexNerve NetPrefrontal CortexPutamenSiblingsSubstance-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID30718492
PMCPMC6362203
OpenAlexW2912779817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.