Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30718453›Full record

ReviewTranslational psychiatry2019

Neurodevelopmental heterogeneity and computational approaches for understanding autism.

Suma Jacob, Jason J Wolff, Michael S Steinbach, Colleen B Doyle, Vipan Kumar, Jed T Elison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suma JacobDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA. sjacob@umn.edu.
Jason J WolffDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Michael S SteinbachDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55416, USA.
Colleen B DoyleInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Vipan KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55416, USA.
Jed T ElisonInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Funding

Infant Brain and Behavioral Signatures of Later Emerging Risk for PsychopathologyR01MH104324 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Brain Imaging Markers of Response to Intervention in Toddlers with AutismK01MH101653 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WOLFF, JASON J · 2013 to 2017
$651k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH101653NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the emerging field of computational psychiatry has impelled the use of machine learning models as a means to further understand the pathogenesis of multiple clinical disorders. In this paper, we discuss how autism spectrum disorder (ASD) was and continues to be diagnosed in the context of its complex neurodevelopmental heterogeneity. We review machine learning approaches to streamline ASD's diagnostic methods, to discern similarities and differences from comorbid diagnoses, and to follow developmentally variable outcomes. Both supervised machine learning models for classification outcome and unsupervised approaches to identify new dimensions and subgroups are discussed. We provide an illustrative example of how computational analytic methods and a longitudinal design can improve our inferential ability to detect early dysfunctional behaviors that may or may not reach threshold levels for formal diagnoses. Specifically, an unsupervised machine learning approach of anomaly detection is used to illustrate how community samples may be utilized to investigate early autism risk, multidimensional features, and outcome variables. Because ASD symptoms and challenges are not static within individuals across development, computational approaches present a promising method to elucidate subgroups of etiological contributions to phenotype, alternative developmental courses, interactions with biomedical comorbidities, and to predict potential responses to therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

ComorbidityMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalAutism Spectrum DisorderHumans

Identifiers

PMID30718453
PMCPMC6362076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.