Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30718374›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2019

Chi-Chih Wu, Axel Klaesson, Julia Buskas, Petter Ranefall, Reza Mirzazadeh, Ola Söderberg, Jochen B W Wolf

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chi-Chih WuScience of Life Laboratories and Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden j.wolf@biologie.uni-muenchen.de macchih@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1130-7051
Axel KlaessonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.
Julia BuskasScience of Life Laboratories and Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.
Petter RanefallScience of Life Laboratories and Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.
Reza MirzazadehScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-17165, Sweden.
Ola SöderbergDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.
Jochen B W WolfScience of Life Laboratories and Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden j.wolf@biologie.uni-muenchen.de macchih@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2958-5183
Uppsala University · SELinköping University · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

European Research Council 336536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional validation of candidate genes involved in adaptation and speciation remains challenging. Here, we exemplify the utility of a method quantifying individual mRNA transcripts in revealing the molecular basis of divergence in feather pigment synthesis during early-stage speciation in crows. Using a padlock probe assay combined with rolling circle amplification, we quantified cell-type-specific gene expression in the histological context of growing feather follicles. Expression of Tyrosinase Related Protein 1 (

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenetic SpeciationAnimalsColorCrowsFeathersMelanocytesPigmentationPigments, BiologicalRNA, MessengerPigments, BiologicalRNA, MessengerFeatherHPGDSMelanogenesisMITFSingle-cell gene expressionSpeciation genetics

Identifiers

PMID30718374
PMCPMC6650291
OpenAlexW2950811144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.