Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30717764›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

An organisational participatory research study of the feasibility of the behaviour change wheel to support clinical teams implementing new models of care.

Eleanor R Bull, Joanne K Hart, Juliette Swift, Kirstie Baxter, Neil McLauchlan, Sophia Joseph, Lucie M T Byrne-Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Workforce Development in Integrated Care: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleanor R BullDivision of Medical Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M139PT, UK. e.bull@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9444-0597
Joanne K HartDivision of Medical Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M139PT, UK.
Juliette SwiftHealth Education England working across the North West, 3rd Floor, 3 Piccadilly Place, Manchester, M1 3BN, UK.
Kirstie BaxterHealth Education England working across the North West, 3rd Floor, 3 Piccadilly Place, Manchester, M1 3BN, UK.
Neil McLauchlanHealth Education England working across the North West, 3rd Floor, 3 Piccadilly Place, Manchester, M1 3BN, UK.
Sophia JosephDivision of Medical Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M139PT, UK.
Lucie M T Byrne-DavisDivision of Medical Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M139PT, UK. lucie.byrne-davis@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Health Education England R119475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth and social care organisations globally are moving towards prevention-focussed community-based, integrated care. The success of this depends on professionals changing practice behaviours. This study explored the feasibility of applying a behavioural science approach to help staff teams from health organisations overcome psychological barriers to change and implement new models of care.

methodsAn Organisational Participatory Research study was conducted with health organisations from North West England, health psychologists and health workforce education commissioners. The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) was applied with teams of professionals seeking help to overcome barriers to practice change. A mixed-methods data collection strategy was planned, including qualitative stakeholder interview and focus groups to explore feasibility factors and quantitative pre-post questionnaires and audits measuring team practice and psychological change barriers. Qualitative data were analysed with thematic analysis; pre-post quantitative data were limited and thus analysed descriptively.

resultsFour clinical teams from paediatrics, midwifery, heart failure and older adult mental health specialties in four organisations enrolled, seeking help to move care to the community, deliver preventative healthcare tasks, or become more integrated. Eighty-one managers, medical doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, midwives and other professionals contributed data. Three teams successfully designed a BCW intervention; two implemented and evaluated this. Five feasibility themes emerged from the thematic analysis of qualitative data. Optimising the BCW in an organisational change context meant 1) qualitative over quantitative data collection, 2) making behavioural science attractive, 3) co-development and a behavioural focus, 4) effective ongoing communication and 5) support from engaged leaders. Pre-post quantitative data collected suggested some positive changes in staff practice behaviours and psychological determinants following the intervention.

conclusionsBehavioural science approaches such as the BCW can be optimised to support teams within health and social care organisations implementing complex new models of care. The efficacy of this approach should now be trialled.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchModels, OrganizationalOrganizational InnovationDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFeasibility StudiesHealth Plan ImplementationHumansLeadershipBehavioural scienceFeasibility studiesHealthcare organisation and deliveryHealth services organizationsOrganisational changeQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30717764
PMCPMC6360652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.