Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30717710›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Postpartum diabetes screening among low income women with gestational diabetes in Missouri 2010-2015.

Cynthia J Herrick, Matthew R Keller, Anne M Trolard, Ben P Cooper, Margaret A Olsen, Graham A Colditz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cynthia J HerrickDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipid Research, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8127, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. herrickc@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9696-6018
Matthew R KellerCenter for Administrative Data Research, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Ave, CB 8051, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Anne M TrolardPublic Health Data and Training Center, Institute for Public Health, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8217, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Ben P CooperCentene Corporation, 7700 Forsyth Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63105, USA.
Margaret A OlsenCenter for Administrative Data Research, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Ave, CB 8051, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CER MENTORED CAREER DEVELOPMENT AWARD KM1KM1CA156708 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, VICTORIA J. · 2010 to 2010
$2.5M
AHRQ HHS R24 HS019455AHRQ HHS R24 HS19455NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR002346NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000448, subaward KL2TR000450NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS KM1 CA156708NCI NIH HHS KM1CA156708NIDDK NIH HHS 1P30DK092950 (pilot)NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes increases risk for type 2 diabetes seven-fold, creating a large public health burden in a young population. In the US, there are no large registries for tracking postpartum diabetes screening among women in under-resourced communities who face challenges with access to care after pregnancy. Existing data from Medicaid claims is limited as women often lose this coverage within months of delivery. In this study, we aim to leverage data from electronic health records and administrative claims to better assess postpartum diabetes screening rates among low income women.

methodsA retrospective population of 1078 women with gestational diabetes who delivered between 1/1/2010 and 10/8/2015 was generated by linking electronic health record data from 21 Missouri Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) with Medicaid administrative claims. Screening rates for diabetes were calculated within 12 weeks and 1 year of delivery. Initial screening after the first postpartum year was also documented.

resultsMedian age in the final population was 28 (IQR 24-33) years with over-representation of black non-Hispanic and urban women. In the final population, 9.7% of women had a recommended diabetes screening test within 12 weeks and 18.9% were screened within 1 year of delivery. An additional 125 women received recommended screening for the first time beyond 1 year postpartum. The percentage of women who had a postpartum visit (83.9%) and any glucose testing (40.6%) in the first year far exceeded the proportion of women with recommended screening tests.

conclusionsLinking electronic health record and administrative claims data provides a more complete picture of healthcare follow-up among low income women after gestational diabetes. While screening rates are higher than reported with claims data alone, there are opportunities to improve adherence to screening guidelines in this population.

Indexed as

PovertyAdultDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMass ScreeningMedicaidMissouriPostnatal CarePregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultCare transitionGestational diabetesHealthcare accessMedicaidPostpartum screening

Identifiers

PMID30717710
PMCPMC6360751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.