ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Characterization and identification of lysine glutarylation based on intrinsic interdependence between positions in the substrate sites.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Processes and therapeutic perspectives of acylation modifications of lysine and cysteine in tumors.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- SIRT5: a potential target for discovering bioactive natural products.Journal of natural medicines · 2025Review
- GBDT_KgluSite: An improved computational prediction model for lysine glutarylation sites based on feature fusion and GBDT classifier.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Deep Neural Network Framework Based on Word Embedding for Protein Glutarylation Sites Prediction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- DissectingACS omega · 2022Article
- ProtTrans-Glutar: Incorporating Features From Pre-trained Transformer-Based Models for Predicting Glutarylation Sites.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Identification of subtypes of anticancer peptides based on sequential features and physicochemical properties.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Functions and Mechanisms of Lysine Glutarylation in Eukaryotes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- iDPGK: characterization and identification of lysine phosphoglycerylation sites based on sequence-based features.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Characterization and identification of lysine crotonylation sites based on machine learning method on both plant and mammalian.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Mal-Prec: computational prediction of protein Malonylation sites via machine learning based feature integration : Malonylation site prediction.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Accurately Predicting Glutarylation Sites Using Sequential Bi-Peptide-Based Evolutionary Features.Genes · 2020Article
- Computational Identification of Lysine Glutarylation Sites Using Positive-Unlabeled Learning.Current genomics · 2020Article
- APBioNet's annual International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB) returns to India in 2018.BMC genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlutarylation, the addition of a glutaryl group (five carbons) to a lysine residue of a protein molecule, is an important post-translational modification and plays a regulatory role in a variety of physiological and biological processes. As the number of experimentally identified glutarylated peptides increases, it becomes imperative to investigate substrate motifs to enhance the study of protein glutarylation. We carried out a bioinformatics investigation of glutarylation sites based on amino acid composition using a public database containing information on 430 non-homologous glutarylation sites.
resultsThe TwoSampleLogo analysis indicates that positively charged and polar amino acids surrounding glutarylated sites may be associated with the specificity in substrate site of protein glutarylation. Additionally, the chi-squared test was utilized to explore the intrinsic interdependence between two positions around glutarylation sites. Further, maximal dependence decomposition (MDD), which consists of partitioning a large-scale dataset into subgroups with statistically significant amino acid conservation, was used to capture motif signatures of glutarylation sites. We considered single features, such as amino acid composition (AAC), amino acid pair composition (AAPC), and composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs (CKSAAP), as well as the effectiveness of incorporating MDD-identified substrate motifs into an integrated prediction model. Evaluation by five-fold cross-validation showed that AAC was most effective in discriminating between glutarylation and non-glutarylation sites, according to support vector machine (SVM).
conclusionsThe SVM model integrating MDD-identified substrate motifs performed well, with a sensitivity of 0.677, a specificity of 0.619, an accuracy of 0.638, and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) value of 0.28. Using an independent testing dataset (46 glutarylated and 92 non-glutarylated sites) obtained from the literature, we demonstrated that the integrated SVM model could improve the predictive performance effectively, yielding a balanced sensitivity and specificity of 0.652 and 0.739, respectively. This integrated SVM model has been implemented as a web-based system (MDDGlutar), which is now freely available at http://csb.cse.yzu.edu.tw/MDDGlutar/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.