Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30717268›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Artificial Intelligence vs. Natural Stupidity: Evaluating AI readiness for the Vietnamese Medical Information System.

Quan-Hoang Vuong, Manh-Tung Ho, Thu-Trang Vuong, Viet-Phuong La, Manh-Toan Ho, Kien-Cuong P Nghiem, Bach Xuan Tran, Hai-Ha Giang, Thu-Vu Giang, Carl Latkin and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Quan-Hoang VuongCenter for Interdisciplinary Social Research, Phenikaa University, Yen Nghia, Ha Dong district, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam. hoang.vuongquan@phenikaa-uni.edu.vn.
Manh-Tung HoCenter for Interdisciplinary Social Research, Phenikaa University, Yen Nghia, Ha Dong district, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam. tung.homanh@phenikaa-uni.edu.vn.
Thu-Trang VuongSciences Po Paris, Campus de Dijon, 21000 Dijon, France. tung.homanh@phenikaa-uni.edu.vn.
Viet-Phuong LaCenter for Interdisciplinary Social Research, Phenikaa University, Yen Nghia, Ha Dong district, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam. phuong.laviet@phenikaa-uni.edu.vn.
Manh-Toan HoCenter for Interdisciplinary Social Research, Phenikaa University, Yen Nghia, Ha Dong district, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam. toan.homanh@phenikaa-uni.edu.vn.
Kien-Cuong P NghiemVietnam-Germany Hospital, Hoan Kiem district, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam. kimcuongvd@gmail.com.
Bach Xuan TranInstitute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam. bach.ipmph@gmail.com.
Hai-Ha GiangInstitute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 100000, Vietnam. giang.ha.18@gmail.com.
Thu-Vu GiangCenter of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 100000, Vietnam. gigi.vugiang@gmail.com.
Carl LatkinBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. carl_latkin@jhu.edu.
Hong-Kong T NguyenA.I. for Social Data Lab (AISDL), Vuong & Associates, Dong Da district, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam. htn2107@caa.columbia.edu.
Cyrus S H HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore. pcmrhcm@nus.edu.sg.
Roger C M HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore. pcmrhcm@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review paper presents a framework to evaluate the artificial intelligence (AI) readiness for the healthcare sector in developing countries: a combination of adequate technical or technological expertise, financial sustainability, and socio-political commitment embedded in a healthy psycho-cultural context could bring about the smooth transitioning toward an AI-powered healthcare sector. Taking the Vietnamese healthcare sector as a case study, this paper attempts to clarify the negative and positive influencers. With only about 1500 publications about AI from 1998 to 2017 according to the latest Elsevier AI report, Vietnamese physicians are still capable of applying the state-of-the-art AI techniques in their research. However, a deeper look at the funding sources suggests a lack of socio-political commitment, hence the financial sustainability, to advance the field. The AI readiness in Vietnam's healthcare also suffers from the unprepared information infrastructure-using text mining for the official annual reports from 2012 to 2016 of the Ministry of Health

Indexed as

AI applicationsAI in healthcareAI in medicine: AI readinessartificial intelligenceVietnam

Identifiers

PMID30717268
PMCPMC6406313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.