Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30717232›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response?

Erminia Mariani, Gina Lisignoli, Rosa Maria Borzì, Lia Pulsatelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 273 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Tissue-bioelectronics interfaces.Chemical Society reviews · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erminia MarianiLaboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e rigenerazione tissutale, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy. erminia.mariani@unibo.it.
Gina LisignoliLaboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e rigenerazione tissutale, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy. gina.lisignoli@ior.it.
Rosa Maria BorzìLaboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e rigenerazione tissutale, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy. rosamaria.borzi@ior.it.
Lia PulsatelliLaboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e rigenerazione tissutale, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy. lia.pulsatelli@ior.it.

Funding

Italian Health Ministry 5x1000University of Bologna RFO fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perspectives of regenerative medicine are still severely hampered by the host response to biomaterial implantation, despite the robustness of technologies that hold the promise to recover the functionality of damaged organs and tissues. In this scenario, the cellular and molecular events that decide on implant success and tissue regeneration are played at the interface between the foreign body and the host inflammation, determined by innate and adaptive immune responses. To avoid adverse events, rather than the use of inert scaffolds, current state of the art points to the use of immunomodulatory biomaterials and their knowledge-based use to reduce neutrophil activation, and optimize M1 to M2 macrophage polarization, Th1 to Th2 lymphocyte switch, and Treg induction. Despite the fact that the field is still evolving and much remains to be accomplished, recent research breakthroughs have provided a broader insight on the correct choice of biomaterial physicochemical modifications to tune the reaction of the host immune system to implanted biomaterial and to favor integration and healing.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAdaptive ImmunityBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationForeign-Body ReactionHumansImmunity, InnateImmunologic FactorsMacrophagesNeutrophil ActivationNeutrophilsTh1 CellsTh1-Th2 BalanceTh2 CellsTissue ScaffoldsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryBiocompatible MaterialsImmunologic Factorsbiomaterialsextra-cellular matrixforeign body reactionimmune responsemacrophagesscaffold

Identifiers

PMID30717232
PMCPMC6386828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.