Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30717089›Full record

ArticleInsects2019

Fluorescent Pan Traps Affect the Capture Rate of Insect Orders in Different Ways.

Mani Shrestha, Jair E Garcia, Justin H J Chua, Scarlett R Howard, Thomas Tscheulin, Alan Dorin, Anders Nielsen, Adrian G Dyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Bees, flowers and UV.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mani ShresthaSchool of Media and Communication, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia. sh.mani@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6165-8418
Jair E GarciaSchool of Media and Communication, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8456-4759
Justin H J ChuaSchool of Media and Communication, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3400-9065
Scarlett R HowardSchool of Media and Communication, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1895-5409
Thomas TscheulinLaboratory of Biogeography and Ecology, Department of Geography, University of the Aegean University Hill, GR-81100 Mytilene, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9901-1521
Alan DorinFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Anders NielsenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Dept. of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-6234
Adrian G DyerSchool of Media and Communication, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2632-9061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To monitor and quantify the changes in pollinator communities over time, it is important to have robust survey techniques of insect populations. Pan traps allow for the assessment of the relative insect abundance in an environment and have been promoted by the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) as an efficient data collection methodology. It has been proposed that fluorescent pan traps are particularly useful, as it has been suggested that they capture high numbers of insects in an unbiased fashion. We use a simultaneous presentation of fluorescent and non-fluorescent pan trap colours to assess how flower-visiting insects of different orders respond to visual stimuli and reveal a significant interaction between trap fluorescence and captured insect type. In particular, Coleoptera (beetles) and Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) were captured significantly more frequently by fluorescent traps, whilst Dipterans (flies) were captured significantly less frequently by this type of pan trap. Hymenopterans (bees and wasps) showed no significant difference in their preference for fluorescent or non-fluorescent traps. Our results reveal that the use of fluorescent pan traps may differently bias insect capture rates when compared to the typical experience of colour flower-visiting insects in natural environments. Correction factors may, therefore, be required for interpreting insect pan trap data collected with different methodologies.

Indexed as

habitat fragmentationnative insectspan trapsurban environment

Identifiers

PMID30717089
PMCPMC6410105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.