Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30716609›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2019

Intentional inhibition but not source memory is related to hallucination-proneness and intrusive thoughts in a university sample.

Ben Alderson-Day, David Smailes, Jamie Moffatt, Kaja Mitrenga, Peter Moseley, Charles Fernyhough

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cognitive Dysfunction as a Risk Factor for Psychosis.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Continuities and Discontinuities in the Cognitive Mechanisms Associated With Clinical and Nonclinical Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ben Alderson-DayDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK. Electronic address: benjamin.alderson-day@durham.ac.uk.
David SmailesDepartment of Psychology, University of Northumbria, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Jamie MoffattDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK; School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
Kaja MitrengaDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Peter MoseleyDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Charles FernyhoughDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Durham University · GBNorthumbria University · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT098455Wellcome Trust WT108720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proneness to unusual perceptual states - such as auditory or visual hallucinations - has been proposed to exist on a continuum in the general population, but whether there is a cognitive basis for such a continuum remains unclear. Intentional cognitive inhibition (the ability to wilfully control thoughts and memories) is one mechanism that has been linked to auditory hallucination susceptibility, but most evidence to date has been drawn from clinical samples only. Moreover, such a link has yet to be demonstrated over and above relations to other cognitive skills (source monitoring) and cognitive states (intrusive thoughts) that often correlate with both inhibition and hallucinations. The present study deployed two tests of intentional inhibition ability - the Inhibition of Currently Irrelevant Memories (ICIM) task and Directed Forgetting (DF) task - and one test of source monitoring (a source memory task) to examine how cognitive task performance relates to self-reported i) auditory hallucination-proneness and ii) susceptibility to intrusive thoughts in a non-clinical student sample (N = 76). Hierarchical regression analyses were used to assess the independent and combined contributions of task performance to proneness scores. ICIM performance but not DF or source memory scores were significantly related to both hallucination-proneness and intrusive thoughts. Further analysis suggested that intrusive thoughts may mediate the link between intentional inhibition skills and auditory hallucination-proneness, suggesting a potential pathway from inhibition to perception via intrusions in cognition. The implications for studying cognitive mechanisms of hallucination and their role in "continuum" views of psychosis-like experiences are discussed.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHallucinationsHumansMaleMemoryModels, PsychologicalNeuropsychological TestsPsychotic DisordersStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultCognitive controlExecutive functionHallucinationsPsychosisSource monitoringWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID30716609
PMCPMC6459394
OpenAlexW2908993122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.