Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30716524›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019

Local Therapy Decisional Regret in Older Women With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Pragati G Advani, Xiudong Lei, Cameron W Swanick, Ying Xu, Yu Shen, Nathan A Goodwin, Grace L Smith, Sharon H Giordano, Kelly K Hunt, Reshma Jagsi and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Factors influencing decision regret regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk of hereditary breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Survivorship Issues in Older Adults with Breast Cancer.Current breast cancer reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The use of theFrontiers in psychology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pragati G AdvaniRadiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Xiudong LeiHealth Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cameron W SwanickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida.
Ying XuHealth Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Yu ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Nathan A GoodwinDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Grace L SmithHealth Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sharon H GiordanoHealth Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kelly K HuntDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Benjamin D SmithHealth Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: bsmith3@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USOrlando Health · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Technology Diffusion in Cancer: Geographic Variations, Facilitators, Outcomes, and CostsR01CA207216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer Patients: Assessing Patient-Reported Measures of the Burdens of TreatmentK07CA211804 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SMITH, GRACE · 2016 to 2020
$853k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211804NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOlder women with nonmetastatic breast cancer can often choose from several surgery and radiation treatment options. Little is known regarding how these choices contribute to decisional regret, which is a negative emotion reflecting the idea that another surgery or radiation decision might have been preferable. We sought to characterize the burden of and examine potential risk factors for local therapy decisional regret among a population-based cohort of older breast cancer survivors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: National Medicare claims for age ≥67 female breast cancer incident in 2009 identified patients treated with lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation, brachytherapy, or endocrine therapy or mastectomy with or without radiation. We sampled 330 patients per treatment group (N = 1650), of whom 1253 agreed to receive a paper survey including the Decisional Regret Scale and EQ-5D-3L Health-Utility Scale. Local therapy regret was defined as neutral or worse response to questions regarding surgery- or radiation-related decisional regret. Local therapy regret risk factors were evaluated using a multivariable generalized linear model. Association of local therapy regret with health utility was modeled using multivariable linear regression.

resultsThe response rate was 30.2% (n = 498 of 1650); 421 surveys were included in this analysis. Median diagnosis age was 72 years, and surveys were completed 6 years after diagnosis. Overall, 23.8% of respondents (n = 100) reported experiencing local therapy decisional regret. Type of local therapy was not associated with local therapy regret. Predictors of increased regret included black race (risk ratio [RR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-3.29), high school education or less (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27-2.75), and axillary nodal dissection (RR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.33-3.41). Local therapy regret was not associated with health utility (P = .37).

conclusionsLocal therapy regret afflicts nearly one quarter of our cohort of older breast cancer survivors, and it is associated with black race, less education, and more extensive nodal dissection, but not breast surgery. Regret is distinct from health utility, suggesting that it is a unique psychosocial construct that merits further study and mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmotionsAgedBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleBrachytherapyBreast NeoplasmsChoice BehaviorCombined Modality TherapyEducational StatusFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMedicare

Identifiers

PMID30716524
PMCPMC6624842
OpenAlexW2915025029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.