Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30716122›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The stability of long-segment and short-segment fixation for treating severe burst fractures at the thoracolumbar junction in osteoporotic bone: A finite element analysis.

Yueh Wu, Chia-Hsien Chen, Fon-Yih Tsuang, Yi-Cheng Lin, Chang-Jung Chiang, Yi-Jie Kuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dorsal instrumentation with and without vertebral body replacement in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures shows comparable outcome measures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yueh WuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Hsien ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Fon-Yih TsuangDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Cheng LinDepartment of Orthopedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chang-Jung ChiangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2269-8337
Yi-Jie KuoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7433-8771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of compressive vertebral fractures in osteoporotic bone occur at the level of the thoracolumbar junction. Immediate decompression is often required in order to reduce the extent of neurological damage. This study evaluated four fixation methods for decompression in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures, and presented the most suitable method for osteoporotic patients. A finite element model of a T7-L5 spinal segment was created and subjected to an L1 corpectomy to simulate a serious burst fracture. Five models were tested: a) intact spine; 2) two segment fixation (TSF), 3) up-three segment fixation (UTSF), below-three segment fixation (BTSF), and four segment fixation (FSF). The ROM, stiffness and compression ratio of the fractured vertebra were recorded under various loading conditions. The results of this study showed that the ROM of the FSF model was the lowest, and the ROMs of UTSF and BTSF models were similar but still greater than the TSF model. Decreasing the BMD to simulate osteoporotic bone resulted in a ROM for the four instrumented models that was higher than the normal bone model. Of all models, the FSF model had the highest stiffness at T12-L2 in extension and lateral bending. Similarly, the compression ratio of the FSF model at L1 was also higher than the other instrumented models. In conclusion, FSF fixation is suggested for patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures. For patients with normal bone quality, both UTSF and BTSF fixation provide an acceptable stiffness in extension and lateral bending, as well as a favorable compression ratio at L1.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, CompressionHumansLumbar VertebraeOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID30716122
PMCPMC6361511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.