Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30716069›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

Genomic insights into neonicotinoid sensitivity in the solitary bee Osmia bicornis.

Katherine Beadle, Kumar Saurabh Singh, Bartlomiej J Troczka, Emma Randall, Marion Zaworra, Christoph T Zimmer, Angela Hayward, Rebecca Reid, Laura Kor, Maxie Kohler and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insecticide susceptibility of Japanese mason bees (Journal of pesticide science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Field-evolved resistance to neonicotinoids in the mosquito,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Katherine BeadleCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Kumar Saurabh SinghCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8352-5897
Bartlomiej J TroczkaDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Emma RandallCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Marion ZaworraBayer AG, Crop Science Division, R&D, Monheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9758-3692
Christoph T ZimmerCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5771-7094
Angela HaywardCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Rebecca ReidDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Laura KorDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Maxie KohlerBayer AG, Crop Science Division, R&D, Monheim, Germany.
Benjamin BuerBayer AG, Crop Science Division, R&D, Monheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9399-9356
David R NelsonDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States of America.
Martin S WilliamsonDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-3670
T G Emyr DaviesDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9452-2947
Linda M FieldDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Ralf NauenBayer AG, Crop Science Division, R&D, Monheim, Germany.
Chris BassCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2590-1492
Rothamsted Research · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBBayer (Germany) · DEUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/OS/CP/000001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of pesticides on the health of bee pollinators is determined in part by the capacity of bee detoxification systems to convert these compounds to less toxic forms. For example, recent work has shown that cytochrome P450s of the CYP9Q subfamily are critically important in defining the sensitivity of honey bees and bumblebees to pesticides, including neonicotinoid insecticides. However, it is currently unclear if solitary bees have functional equivalents of these enzymes with potentially serious implications in relation to their capacity to metabolise certain insecticides. To address this question, we sequenced the genome of the red mason bee, Osmia bicornis, the most abundant and economically important solitary bee species in Central Europe. We show that O. bicornis lacks the CYP9Q subfamily of P450s but, despite this, exhibits low acute toxicity to the N-cyanoamidine neonicotinoid thiacloprid. Functional studies revealed that variation in the sensitivity of O. bicornis to N-cyanoamidine and N-nitroguanidine neonicotinoids does not reside in differences in their affinity for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor or speed of cuticular penetration. Rather, a P450 within the CYP9BU subfamily, with recent shared ancestry to the Apidae CYP9Q subfamily, metabolises thiacloprid in vitro and confers tolerance in vivo. Our data reveal conserved detoxification pathways in model solitary and eusocial bees despite key differences in the evolution of specific pesticide-metabolising enzymes in the two species groups. The discovery that P450 enzymes of solitary bees can act as metabolic defence systems against certain pesticides can be leveraged to avoid negative pesticide impacts on these important pollinators.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesBiological EvolutionCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemEuropeGenomicsInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsPollinationThiazinesCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsthiaclopridThiazines

Identifiers

PMID30716069
PMCPMC6375640
OpenAlexW2912695519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.