ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2019
Maqasid al-Shariah Based Islamic Bioethics: A Comprehensive Approach.
Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulations Governing Sex Selection in Bangladesh: Implications of Islamic Law and Ethics.Asian bioethics review · 2026Article
- Considering Islamic Frameworks to Infectious Disease Prevention.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Article
- Human cognitive enhancement and reprogenetic technologies in Malaysia - A survey study of local Muslim undergraduate students' viewpoints.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Islamic Perspectives on Polygenic Testing and Selection of IVF Embryos (PGT-P) for Optimal Intelligence and Other Non-Disease-Related Socially Desirable Traits.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2024Article
- A Framework for Examining Bioethical Issues from a Sunni Perspective: Maslaha.Journal of religion and health · 2024Article
- Islamic Perspectives on Elective Ovarian Tissue Freezing by Single Women for Non-medical or Social Reasons.Asian bioethics review · 2023Article
- Justification for requiring disclosure of diagnoses and prognoses to dying patients in saudi medical settings: a Maqasid Al-Shariah-based Islamic bioethics approach.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- A Critique of Contemporary Islamic Bioethics.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2021Article
- Honouring Wishes of Patients: An Islamic View on the Implementation of the Advance Medical Directive in Malaysia.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2021Review
- Using the Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah to Furnish an Islamic Bioethics: Conceptual and Practical Issues.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2019Article
- A Journey Through Global Bioethics.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maqasid al-Shariah based Islamic bioethics is an Islamic bioethics concept which uses the objectives of the Shariah (maqasid al-Shariah) as its approach in analysing and assessing bioethical issues. Analysis based on maqasid al-Shariah based Islamic bioethics will examine any bioethical issues from three main aspects namely intention, method, and output or final goal of the studied issues. Then, the evaluation will be analysed from human interest hierarchy, inclusivity, and degree of certainty. The Islamic bioethics concept is a manifestation of dynamic Islamic jurisprudence which can overcome new complex and complicated bioethical issues such as tri-parent baby technology issues. Therefore, this article will introduce and explain the concept of maqasid al-Shariah based Islamic bioethics and outline a general guidance of maqasid al-Shariah based Islamic bioethics to determine a maqṣad (objective) based on standards of human good or well-being (maslahah) and harm (mafsadah).
Indexed as
Identifiers
30715660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.